|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2017-3-24. : 1:05 am]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- it converts the palette to 2-bit greyscale using this formula xD[2017-3-24. : 1:00 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- if it starts at 0 (the value was 768), then it will go through all 256 possible entries[2017-3-24. : 12:57 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- just take the length of the section and keep only the LSB, and then subtract 3 until it reaches 0 and it works[2017-3-24. : 12:56 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I'm proud of myself for noticing that, because I was pretty stumped trying to figure out how to either easily divide by 3 or keep track of everything going on without use of an extra register[2017-3-24. : 12:55 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- cool, I can use 1 byte to count down the number of entries in the PLTE chunk without using any division despite it having a max value of 768  [2017-3-24. : 12:54 am] zsnakezz -- like i said, that is an extremely vague, but yet irrefutable argument.[2017-3-24. : 12:54 am] zsnakezz -- it is simple math, if everybody was accounted for accurately, our perception of what is popular would be more realistic[2017-3-24. : 12:51 am] zsnakezz -- im not saying im perfect, but i idealistically,i do not have confirmation bias, nor do i feel like im making excuses for my arguement that are not backed up by facts[2017-3-24. : 12:50 am] zsnakezz -- nothing irrational about it, but im not sober, so the rate of presentation could quite very well be irrational[2017-3-24. : 12:50 am] zsnakezz -- well you accused me of confirmation bias, my argument is that i couldn't possibly have confirmation bias if i allow enough influence from other ways of thinking[2017-3-24. : 12:47 am] Moose -- Yeah, I'm just being salty about your refusal to be reasonable in what could have been a rational exchange of ideas LMAO[2017-3-24. : 12:46 am] zsnakezz -- because i dont see value in comments like the one you just made, even though i should, because that's what i'm always fighting to preserve[2017-3-24. : 12:44 am] zsnakezz -- and optimal enjoyment i will achieve tonight, because i want to be a different guy tomorrow, and i will see it through[2017-3-24. : 12:43 am] zsnakezz -- persuasion is rarely worth it, working and testing provides optimal enjoyment[2017-3-24. : 12:42 am] zsnakezz -- i mean it's a persuasive argument, people will cite things if they are persuaded[2017-3-24. : 12:40 am] zsnakezz -- these are arguments i would stand by even if i was being executed[2017-3-24. : 12:39 am] Moose -- You have violated #3 and #4. The discussion is terminated. Good day.[2017-3-24. : 12:39 am] Moose -- Oh, it's "common sense". So you don't need evidence for your arguments.[2017-3-24. : 12:39 am] zsnakezz -- within that wiggle room i think you could demand citations for people's actions, im making an idealistic argument[2017-3-24. : 12:38 am] zsnakezz -- of coarse viewing things at a more base value would be more efficient, but humanity demands privacy and time[2017-3-24. : 12:37 am] zsnakezz -- i really didn't say anything that can't be proved with common sense, if i was more specific in the argument perhaps it could be refuted[2017-3-24. : 12:29 am] zsnakezz -- also. it's mostly based on simple math, confirmation bias and anecdotes mean little in regards to some of these things[2017-3-24. : 12:26 am] Moose -- OK, so a combination of anecdotal evidence and confirmation bias, got it.[2017-3-24. : 12:26 am] zsnakezz -- that is on you, i made an educated argument that i believe to be true[2017-3-24. : 12:26 am] zsnakezz -- no, if you find value within the argument, you will seek your own proof[2017-3-24. : 12:25 am] zsnakezz -- well. i know for a fact it's more valuable for you to cite it yourself, if you think it is worth doing so[2017-3-24. : 12:24 am] Moose -- zsnakezzzsnakezz shouted: and the math supports that analysis, even wealthy people in more rural communities are proven to be more stand offish in more situations "math" Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: [citation needed] [2017-3-24. : 12:24 am]  lil-Inferno -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: lil-Inferno no shit LMAO ya LMAO[2017-3-24. : 12:24 am] zsnakezz -- and the math supports that analysis, even wealthy people in more rural communities are proven to be more stand offish in more situations[2017-3-24. : 12:23 am] lil-Inferno -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: I'd be surprised if he wasn't referencing the 3/5ths compromise I was[2017-3-24. : 12:23 am] lil-Inferno -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: In unrelated news, cookie AF LMAO who cares[2017-3-24. : 12:22 am] zsnakezz -- im saying those living in cities are most likely more willing to work with different kinds of people[2017-3-24. : 12:22 am] Moose -- When you cut 40% of the value of someone's votes because they don't live in a city, it's pretty clear what you value regardless of whether you're "saying" it or not.[2017-3-24. : 12:22 am] zsnakezz -- or they literally don't have access to the things they need to apply their studies[2017-3-24. : 12:21 am] zsnakezz -- some people don't have the resources to make educated decisions because they are on survival mode within the economy[2017-3-24. : 12:20 am] zsnakezz -- im not saying value cities more, im saying value what is there for what it is[2017-3-24. : 12:20 am] Moose -- There's plenty of rural trash, but there's plenty of inner city trash, too.[2017-3-24. : 12:20 am] Moose -- I wasn't aware choosing to not live in a city made you antisocial and uncooperative.[2017-3-24. : 12:20 am] jjf28 -- just make yourself a wealthy Caucasian male and you can have full voting rights[2017-3-24. : 12:18 am] zsnakezz -- well as i see it, it justly creates a disposition whilst providing an almost unfair advantage to bettering yourself |
, write assembly and C for embedded $y$tem$ and make fat $tack$
Members Online: 
DarkenedFantasies
DarkenedFantasies