|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2016-12-05. : 9:31 pm]  Moose -- LMAO, go to download a file from the DLDB: "This web page at www.staredit.net has been reported to contain unwanted software and has been blocked based on your security preferences."[2016-12-05. : 9:17 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- also it seems on this page now the » is working in the pages[2016-12-05. : 9:16 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- that's what I was checking. Maybe using &#____; gets around it?[2016-12-05. : 9:06 pm]  NudeRaider -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: why is SEN ISO-8859-1 and not UTF-8? doesn't this contradict FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: 👻 this?[2016-12-05. : 8:02 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- EchoEcho shouted: What happened to the DLDB what's wrong with the dldb?[2016-12-05. : 4:55 pm] NudeRaider -- Cool SEN shoutbox is broken for me again. Moose stop switching states. Or is it SENs way of telling us it's confused with what's going on in the shoutbox?[2016-12-05. : 12:23 pm] jjf28 -- UK court starting to debate who has the authority to execute article 50[2016-12-05. : 12:08 pm] Moose -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: I like how getting to the 3rd paragraph woulda preempted our entire argument xD "While all programs that take a set of programming specifications and translate them, i.e. create a means to execute those specifications, are technically "compilers", the term generally means a program that produces a separate executable from the compiler (that may require a run time library or subsystem to operate), a compiler that merely executes the original specifications is usually referred to as an "interpreter", although because of differing methods of analyzing what represents compilation and what represents interpretation, there is some overlap between the two terms." Now where's the fun in that?[2016-12-05. : 9:48 am]  MasterJohnny -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: Delete all forums IMO leave only shoutbox If we do this, I demand latex support for the shoutbox[2016-12-05. : 7:25 am] Lanthanide -- nah, it's just people generally want recompense for this sort of boring develoment[2016-12-05. : 7:01 am] NudeRaider -- ever thought about that? We must be a terrible community. Every admin or coder lost their motivation upon being in the job for a while.[2016-12-05. : 5:43 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf, why haven't you linked to this already? I am ashamed.[2016-12-05. : 5:41 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: that's how I feel it should be; but absent of another definition Cecil is unavoidably technically correct Ah, the best kind of correct. [2016-12-05. : 5:39 am] jjf28 -- that's how I feel it should be; but absent of another definition Cecil is unavoidably technically correct [2016-12-05. : 5:39 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- it's not turning it in to that code, it's just performing synonymous code[2016-12-05. : 5:38 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- interpreting is just that, reading a little bit and then immediately running predefined code that does the intended operation ;o[2016-12-05. : 5:37 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I've never considered interpreters as compilers, compiling to me means to actually turn it into a different form[2016-12-05. : 5:37 am] CecilSunkure -- I'd put the interpreting circle entirely into the compiling circle[2016-12-05. : 5:36 am] jjf28 -- in a venn diagram I'd put them in their own circles with some overlap[2016-12-05. : 5:34 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- emulators sometimes do that because it's faster to recompile to native machine code than to interpret it[2016-12-05. : 5:34 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- unless you re-compile the code to be interpreted, then run that[2016-12-05. : 5:33 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: I like how getting to the 3rd paragraph woulda preempted our entire argument xD "While all programs that take a set of programming specifications and translate them, i.e. create a means to execute those specifications, are technically "compilers", the term generally means a program that produces a separate executable from the compiler (that may require a run time library or subsystem to operate), a compiler that merely executes the original specifications is usually referred to as an "interpreter", although because of differing methods of analyzing what represents compilation and what represents interpretation, there is some overlap between the two terms." I figured a compiler turned a thing in to code to run on the CPU (or I guess you could compile to code to be interpreted), whereas an interpreter runs predefined machine code based on the interpreted code as input ;o[2016-12-05. : 5:16 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- (there are such things as duplicate instructions, and with prefixes you can fill your instructions with all sorts of garbage too)[2016-12-05. : 5:12 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- though it's stupid not to just use ASM because they're 1:1 (usually)[2016-12-05. : 5:12 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Is machine code a programming language? C|X^D I've written in machine code before[2016-12-05. : 5:07 am] lil-Inferno -- LanthanideLanthanide shouted: we're not yet a vassel state of the uS cuz you don't have oil[2016-12-05. : 4:31 am] jjf28 -- I like how getting to the 3rd paragraph woulda preempted our entire argument xD "While all programs that take a set of programming specifications and translate them, i.e. create a means to execute those specifications, are technically "compilers", the term generally means a program that produces a separate executable from the compiler (that may require a run time library or subsystem to operate), a compiler that merely executes the original specifications is usually referred to as an "interpreter", although because of differing methods of analyzing what represents compilation and what represents interpretation, there is some overlap between the two terms."[2016-12-05. : 4:14 am] jjf28 -- not gonna care bout getting the 25FPS document processor up to 60FPS[2016-12-05. : 4:13 am] CecilSunkure -- game not much different from operating systems, or from microsoft word, or your Uber app |
Members Online: ihjel, LachlanFairbairn653