Ez would have left either way.

Clarification: I only killed
4 people, including owner.
None.
There were three pieces of evidence that could have been used to figure out the killer was LoTu)S. His identity could have been determined without anyone even leaving the lobby. He started the game unaware of all said evidence.
LoTu)S found one piece of evidence against himself, which he can tell you about if he wants. Aristocrat may be able to shed some light on another one, though he might not realize he had as much information as he did (or might not have cared, considering it was late in the game and he already thought LoTu)S was the killer weeks ago).
Edit: I just went back to check, Aristocrat informed me he knew LoTu)S was the killer on the night of September 6th.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 25 2010, 6:12 pm by Azrael.Wrath.
I
guessed, too.
Edit: By the way LoTu)S, you just don't have any idea how lucky you were that one turn we met in the hallway.

What happened to David, by the way?
Quote from name:Taylor Swift
and here I thought Tuxedo was the killer, I was wrong.
So much less exciting. In an indirect sense, you might not have been wrong.
Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Sep 25 2010, 7:07 pm by Tuxedo-Templar.
None.
Still holding the book, you pick up the two full whiskey bottles and wield one in each hand. You use the fingers you have free to flip back another page in the journal, to an entry dated seven days ago.
"My plans have already been set into motion! Today I was talking to someone and casually brought up the topic of them coming here for the weekend. At first they declined, saying they would be busy on Saturday, but then offered to stay for a few hours the night before. This has given me a great idea! If anyone declines to stay the entire weekend, then I'll ask if they can come for a little while on Friday instead. This will allow me to invite many more people than I originally thought possible.
My new cell phone is also working well, and greatly facilitated the exchange of information with him. All I have to do is add anyone who agrees to come to my contacts list, and I'll be able to call them all quite easily when it's time to arrange their transportation. Letters and face-to-face arrangements are much more personal than a telephone, but if I'm going to be making some friends then I suppose I'll need a way to communicate efficiently with them. It wasn't that long ago I would have never considered owning a cell phone, now I can't even imagine not having it with me."
You flip back another page, to read an entry dated eight days ago.
"I'm starting a new chapter of my life today, and thus a new journal to commemorate it. I refuse to live a lonely existence any longer, and have come up with a way to solve the problem: I will begin inviting people to spend next weekend here! I can only invite three people, though I'll hopefully make friends with at least one of them. I need to start making plans and deciding who I will be asking."
Another entry is below it, with the same date.
"I had a remarkable idea earlier! I went into town and visited a furniture supplier, who is bringing out a number of beds, nightstands, and similar things for the guest bedrooms. Now I will be able to invite six people, two to each room. Some may be uncomfortable with that, but I'm sure I can find six to fill the rooms, that's less than one person per day! Tomorrow morning I'm going to shop for a cell phone, something I'm not happy about but it is an unfortunate necessity. Although business arrangements are easy enough to make without a phone, I'm afraid that personal relationships are not. I'm sure I can get used to it though."
You note that this is the first page of the journal.
From a PM Aristo sent me.
None.

An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death
Clarification: I only killed 4 people, including owner.
So it's a tie, then...
Mine were all players, though
The owner's cell phone was in his back pocket the whole time

By the way, if you look at those entries in order, it should be clear which one refers to the killer.
Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
The owner's cell phone was in his back pocket the whole time


:massi-fucking-mo:
By the way, if you look at those entries in order, it should be clear which one refers to the killer.
Yeah, the one that mentions the owner's feeling of death upon him or something.

THE ONE DIARY ENTRY I STOPPED JUST BEFORE GETTING TO READ.
None.
If you add up all the people he said would come, it's exactly 15, meaning everyone is accounted for.
The contacts in his cell phone are not listed in alphabetic order.
Interesting.
What was the evidence piece you said the killer was able to physically remove?
None.
Quote from name:Tuxedo-Templar
What was the evidence piece you said the killer was able to physically remove?
The bloody clothes in the room of EzTerix and Zilean were from the killer. LoTu)S was drenched in blood when he committed the murder, and ran up to his room to change. He heard the scream as he was finishing up, and left his room, throwing the blood-soaked clothes into their room when he walked by.
However, unknown to him was that in his haste to remove his shirt, he had broken one of the bloody buttons off while he was disrobing. The button fell into the pocket of the pants he had just finished changing into.
The reason he could only find this evidence with a physical action is because its presence was unknown to him. When he said "Recall what items I have in my pockets," it wasn't on the list. Physically checking the pocket was the only way to discover it.
Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
Quote from name:Tuxedo-Templar
What was the evidence piece you said the killer was able to physically remove?
The bloody clothes in the room of EzTerix and Zilean were from the killer. LoTu)S was drenched in blood when he committed the murder, and ran up to his room to change. He heard the scream as he was finishing up, and left his room, throwing the blood-soaked clothes into their room when he walked by.
However, unknown to him was that in his haste to remove his shirt, he had broken one of the bloody buttons off while he was disrobing. The button fell into the pocket of the pants he had just finished changing into.
The reason he could only find this evidence with a physical action is because its presence was unknown to him. When he said "Recall what items I have in my pockets," it wasn't on the list. Physically checking the pocket was the only way to discover it.
Not like people would check my pockets anyways.
None.
Not unless someone incapacitated you and found it while searching your body and then made the connection.
None.
Not like people would check my pockets anyways.

Maybe they should have been checking everyone's pockets for evidence
I just assumed from Aristo's scan of the crowd there was nothing further of suspicion to be found, personally.

I was less focused on scanning as I was on making sure no one left the room for
a reason very similar to that one.
You mentioned other empirical evidences pieces. What were they?
None.
I thought Lotu)s was the killer ever since Wing-Zero died.
and rotfl at the bloody clothes I knew it was the killer who used it.
I have a couple questions. Like why didn't lotu)s kill me instead of knocking me out (would people suspect him?)
Does it turn to morning after about 50 turns or when it ends?
How long until the house would've burned down to the fire? xd
and uhh what was the I key took used for?
Overall great game Lotu)s you sneaky sneak.
None.
Quote from name:Tuxedo-Templar
You mentioned other empirical evidences pieces. What were they?
If you look at the information I provided about the journal and the cell phone, you can reason that comparing the information from the two would result in the killer's identity.
The third piece of evidence was the knife that killed the owner. It was a duplicate in a set of two identical knives, and the other one was in LoTu)S' bag in his room.
I didnt even know where my room was.
So i did a
*Recall where my room was.*Move toward that location.
None.