Polls
Feb 4 2009, 6:21 pm
By: Lord Malvanis  

Feb 4 2009, 6:21 pm Lord Malvanis Post #1



I would like to see a repick feature on polls because just today, I wanted to answer a poll and I picked before reading then realized I wanted something else. I go to see if theres a repick button and there isn't, So this is why I'm making this post. Your probably going to tell me I'm stupid for answering before I read, but that wouldn't be a problem if there was a repick button. So IP, would it be possible for you to add that?



None.

Feb 4 2009, 6:55 pm Devourer Post #2

Hello

I'm against this because I think that "voted is voted".
If you are not sure then don't vote or first read something about the thread the poll is about.



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Feb 4 2009, 7:54 pm Moose Post #3

Armor: 90.50%

Why should we have to compensate for your shortcomings?

At best it should be optional to the poll creator.




Feb 4 2009, 8:03 pm Echo Post #4



It's life. That's why you have to compensate before making a decision. It's like going to the election poll, voting, and then changing your mind. SEN is therefore, preparing you to the real world. You're welcome.



None.

Feb 4 2009, 8:39 pm Lord Malvanis Post #5



The poll was the "Favorite RP Map Maker" poll, which you obviously don't need to read about to know what it is.



None.

Feb 4 2009, 10:09 pm InsolubleFluff Post #6



You were twatish for being so hasty. Echo cut the real world shit... it's annoying when school says it, more so on a StarCraft forum...



None.

Feb 4 2009, 10:44 pm Echo Post #7



Quote from name:Shocko
You were twatish for being so hasty. Echo cut the real world shit... it's annoying when school says it, more so on a StarCraft forum...
Then don't read it? I'm entitled to post what I want as long as it doesn't go against the rules. And I was being sarcastic, sorry you couldn't pick it up.



None.

Feb 5 2009, 2:16 am DT_Battlekruser Post #8



I think it's a fine (if unimportant) option, if

(a) it is only available within 200 seconds of your vote (like self post-delete)
(b) it is only available when you can see the results before voting or you can't see the results until you waive your ability to repick




None.

Feb 5 2009, 2:21 am O)FaRTy1billion[MM] Post #9

👻 👾 👽 💪

Quote from DT_Battlekruser
I think it's a fine (if unimportant) option, if

(a) it is only available within 200 seconds of your vote (like self post-delete)
(b) it is only available when you can see the results before voting or you can't see the results until you waive your ability to repick
Or if it is available when you can't see replies (and perhaps the poll is ambiguous). ;o



TinyMap2 - Latest in map compression! ( 7/09/14 - New build! )
EUD Action Enabler - Lightweight EUD/EPD support! (ChaosLauncher/MPQDraft support!)
EUDDB - topic - Help out by adding your EUDs! Or Submit reference files in the References tab!
MapSketch - New image->map generator!
EUDTrig - topic - Quickly and easily convert offsets to EUDs! (extended players supported)
SC2 Map Texture Mask Importer/Exporter - Edit texture placement in an image editor!
\:farty\: This page has been viewed [img]http://farty1billion.dyndns.org/Clicky.php?img.gif[/img] times!

Feb 6 2009, 1:34 pm Forsaken Archer Post #10



There's a problem with clearing your vote and showing what users voted for what simply because of how polls are stored. I wanted to implement both (as optional).
Simple polls wouldn't be that much of a problem, but polls with multiple answers, weights, etc get a lot more complicated.



None.

Feb 6 2009, 5:21 pm Demented Shaman Post #11



The most it should do is just ask for confirmation before it actually submits. Something like "You have voted for X. Are you sure you want to do this?" And then have a yes or no thing.



None.

Feb 7 2009, 1:27 am Dapperdan Post #12



Quote from name:Barack Obama
The most it should do is just ask for confirmation before it actually submits. Something like "You have voted for X. Are you sure you want to do this?" And then have a yes or no thing.

Please no. That would annoy the shit out of me.



None.

Feb 7 2009, 2:27 am Demented Shaman Post #13



Quote from Dapperdan
Quote from name:Barack Obama
The most it should do is just ask for confirmation before it actually submits. Something like "You have voted for X. Are you sure you want to do this?" And then have a yes or no thing.

Please no. That would annoy the shit out of me.
Make it ask for confirmation by default, but have an option to disable it in the settings.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[03:02 am]
Vrael -- which does reduce down to the same tradeoff I mentioned below, aka trading APM for time, but still interesting
[03:01 am]
Vrael -- and while the reaver was reloading it used that time to aggregate enough marine/tank to fend it off
[03:01 am]
Vrael -- like its micro vs one of the in-base reaver drops was pretty insane, basically it made the reaver spend 1 scarab per unit instead of 1 scarab for many workers/units
[02:58 am]
Vrael -- all the stuff I've said below is based on the actual gameplay vs some strong human performers, seems like the bot just has unfair advantages, but its also doing some cool stuff
[02:57 am]
Vrael -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
I mean human brains trained the bot too, its not completely infeasible for the bot to actually be strong in certain scenarios
[10:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations
[10:12 pm]
Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: l)ark_ssj9kevin, Symmetry