Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: Terran Beacon info
Terran Beacon info
Feb 22 2008, 5:23 pm
By: Dabbu  

Feb 22 2008, 5:23 pm Dabbu Post #1



Just so you know, both Terran Beacons can burn to death when in the red (via HP tigger, or preset in editor).
It acts much like a normal Terran building in the red but without the fire animation.
Turning on invincible will NOT stop it from dieing.
It will not add to building deaths in the final score tally. Beacons aren't actually considered buildings.



None.

Feb 22 2008, 5:28 pm lil-Inferno Post #2

Just here for the pie

Not sure why anyone would need to know that, but ok. I guess some person will need a beacon to be killed in their map eventually ;/ .

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Feb 22 2008, 5:29 pm by lil-Inferno. Reason: Adding




Feb 22 2008, 5:51 pm Dabbu Post #3



if I were me, but a different person, I'd respond to my post the same.



None.

Feb 22 2008, 6:11 pm y10k Post #4



There are:
Units, buildings and specials (like baecon or unused terran bldg)

Both buildings and specials suffer the low-hp-damage-thing.
1. So it not necessaryly means, it is a building
2. There is no way to kill a special, you will never get score for that. You can make it to die, but you cant kill it.



None.

Feb 22 2008, 6:16 pm Falkoner Post #5



Quote
I guess some person will need a beacon to be killed in their map eventually ;/ .

Not really :P Think about it, if I needed it dead, I could just remove it and create and kill a unit.



None.

Feb 22 2008, 6:54 pm who Post #6



but if you wanted a timer for it to die without using DCs, waits, or a countdown timer, setting the hp % would work.



None.

Feb 22 2008, 7:04 pm Moose Post #7

meme

Quote from Dabbu
It acts much like a normal Terran building in the red but without the fire animation.
Turning on invincible will NOT stop it from dieing.
FYI, turning on invincibilityn ever stopped any Terran building from burning down.




Feb 23 2008, 12:26 am Dabbu Post #8



huh... i didn't know that about Invincibility and Fire on T buildings...

but yea, someone09 hit the nail on the head. It's basically a really cheap countdown-counter.



None.

Feb 23 2008, 4:51 am Ultramilkman Post #9



Protect the beacon map?
Protect the beacon from enemy unit, each unit that reaches the beacon will reduce it's hp by 5%, and blah blah blah, just ideas :)



None.

Feb 23 2008, 9:41 am NudeRaider Post #10

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

That has nothing to do with the burning effect.
Infact reducing it by 5% of the former value may even HEAL the beacon when more than 5% hp already burned down.




Feb 24 2008, 12:49 am FooFighters Post #11



don't use the terran beacon for the map then, just use a beacon that doesn't take damage over time, FYI, the protoss beacon/flag beacon, zerg too



None.

Feb 24 2008, 1:03 am Falkoner Post #12



Ah, but then that just proves that this information is worthless! BUWHHAHAAHAH.

Actually, I just realized it's a great way to get people for COPing, constantly set it to 5% health in the location it starts in, so if they COP it, it stops healing and burns! BOOAHHAHA



None.

Feb 26 2008, 12:59 am blacklight28 Post #13





It burns for me... just kidding, I put inviso bunk on top. But this isn't assistance really...



None.

Feb 26 2008, 1:27 am Riney Post #14

Thigh high affectionado

KILL IT WITH FIRE....oh wait.

I didnt spam my favorite picture again >:D



.riney on Discord.
Riney on Steam (Steam)
@RineyCat on Twitter

Sure I didn't pop off on SCBW like I wanted to, but I won VRChat. Map maker for life.

Feb 26 2008, 1:29 am stickynote Post #15



lol. I don't see why you would use a beacon for a physical countdown timer though. It'd be better to use a burning terran building so that the players can click on it and see the life go down.



None.

Feb 26 2008, 3:06 am blacklight28 Post #16



So you don't know how much time is left before it dies and whatever your counting down to happens.



None.

Feb 26 2008, 3:12 am Ryan Post #17



In that case you could just enable invincibility for a Terran building. Unless you really want to see a flashing thing go boom :)



None.

Mar 3 2008, 3:05 am Brontobyte Post #18



Does it show fire animation? It would be cool if it did, because it can be walked over. :flamer:



None.

Mar 3 2008, 3:11 am Centreri Post #19

Relatively ancient and inactive

Hmm... This may be just me, but I see a four-section bound map with a beacon in the middle. Pass a section, step on the beacon, and heals to 5%. Take too long with the bound, and lose.



None.

Mar 3 2008, 3:18 am NudeRaider Post #20

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Oh really? And I see four-section bound map with a command center in the middle. Pass a section, step near the CC and heal it to 5%. Take too long and you can see the hp burn down, and lose.




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:51 am]
NimoStar -- And Pathfinding in SC1 was not *that* bad, the problem is that it was designed as a flat 2D game like WC1 (and it was in the alpha) and then switched to isometric without changing the base code. So its actually a flat game pretending to be isometric. With the custom competitive maps that use larger ramps and elevation, pathfinding is quite fixed.
[09:47 am]
NimoStar -- The unlocking and map choice was fine, but mostly in WoL - In HoTS the worst of all units are irrelevant because Kerrigan has infinite summon and stuff. And even in WoL the spaceship instakill map powers are better than units. If I could RTS in my RTS that'd be great.
[2026-3-05. : 8:45 pm]
NudeRaider -- Nekron
Nekron shouted: NudeRaider not that the og sc1 campaigns are particularly good mechanically but cmon, SC2 map mechanics are the opposite of fun
There's many parts to it. I think the raw rts gameplay of sc1 is unsurpassed to this day. And I too never liked that sc2 missions always rush you in some way or another, because I like to take my time. However I still have to admit that they way they did it often was always pretty cool. Like lava rising and receding, a huge-ass mothership destroying bases, undead coming at night, just to name a few, those are definitely creative, so I'm sure there's people that liked it. But that's not even what I meant. It's the unlocking of new features and upgrades and choice which map to play next that made it so much more motivating for me.
[2026-3-05. : 6:49 pm]
Nekron -- like the train maps, enemies just kind of come at you (I'm not sure if there is a real enemy base, there might be one just on a technicality - you are to never interact with its production) and then you gotta chase trains for lulz
[2026-3-05. : 6:48 pm]
Nekron -- and even in WoL imo everything ends up feeling like you're just getting a lot of hidden timers that kind of force you into awkward resource management between main objective and defending your base against enemies from beyond this world
[2026-3-05. : 6:47 pm]
Nekron -- some ideas were okay in WoL but the further you go the worse it gets
[2026-3-05. : 6:46 pm]
Nekron -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: also the sc2 campaign mechanics were way more fun and involving
not that the og sc1 campaigns are particularly good mechanically but cmon, SC2 map mechanics are the opposite of fun
[2026-3-03. : 9:33 pm]
Ultraviolet -- boo sacrilege, get outta here
[2026-3-03. : 8:47 am]
NudeRaider -- also the sc2 campaign mechanics were way more fun and involving
[2026-3-03. : 8:38 am]
NudeRaider -- maybe that people don't actually like the pathfinding jank and having to use trigger duplicators to do basic arithmetic.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Excalibur