|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2017-3-24. : 1:36 am]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- djnz is a z80 one that is do{ ... }while(b--);, and only with b[2017-3-24. : 1:35 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- ld x,y means x=y, call means "go to this address, then come back here when you get to return", ld (x),y means *(u8*)x=y, inc x is x++, dec x is x--, etc.[2017-3-24. : 1:32 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- maybe instead I should just write everything in Brainfuck[2017-3-24. : 1:30 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- at the end I could probably change that rla \ ld a,c \ adc a,0 to rla \ and 1 \ add a,c instead, that might be more clear. ;o how it is written there was an afterthought anyway[2017-3-24. : 1:28 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- the only messy part is dividing by 11  http://pastebin.com/m5szCC1U[2017-3-24. : 1:10 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- will they have me write PNG decoders for embedded systems? xD[2017-3-24. : 1:05 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- it converts the palette to 2-bit greyscale using this formula xD[2017-3-24. : 1:00 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- if it starts at 0 (the value was 768), then it will go through all 256 possible entries[2017-3-24. : 12:57 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- just take the length of the section and keep only the LSB, and then subtract 3 until it reaches 0 and it works[2017-3-24. : 12:56 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I'm proud of myself for noticing that, because I was pretty stumped trying to figure out how to either easily divide by 3 or keep track of everything going on without use of an extra register[2017-3-24. : 12:55 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- cool, I can use 1 byte to count down the number of entries in the PLTE chunk without using any division despite it having a max value of 768 [2017-3-24. : 12:54 am] zsnakezz -- like i said, that is an extremely vague, but yet irrefutable argument.[2017-3-24. : 12:54 am] zsnakezz -- it is simple math, if everybody was accounted for accurately, our perception of what is popular would be more realistic[2017-3-24. : 12:51 am] zsnakezz -- im not saying im perfect, but i idealistically,i do not have confirmation bias, nor do i feel like im making excuses for my arguement that are not backed up by facts[2017-3-24. : 12:50 am] zsnakezz -- nothing irrational about it, but im not sober, so the rate of presentation could quite very well be irrational[2017-3-24. : 12:50 am] zsnakezz -- well you accused me of confirmation bias, my argument is that i couldn't possibly have confirmation bias if i allow enough influence from other ways of thinking[2017-3-24. : 12:47 am] Moose -- Yeah, I'm just being salty about your refusal to be reasonable in what could have been a rational exchange of ideas LMAO[2017-3-24. : 12:46 am] zsnakezz -- because i dont see value in comments like the one you just made, even though i should, because that's what i'm always fighting to preserve[2017-3-24. : 12:44 am] zsnakezz -- and optimal enjoyment i will achieve tonight, because i want to be a different guy tomorrow, and i will see it through[2017-3-24. : 12:43 am] zsnakezz -- persuasion is rarely worth it, working and testing provides optimal enjoyment[2017-3-24. : 12:42 am] zsnakezz -- i mean it's a persuasive argument, people will cite things if they are persuaded[2017-3-24. : 12:40 am] zsnakezz -- these are arguments i would stand by even if i was being executed[2017-3-24. : 12:39 am] Moose -- You have violated #3 and #4. The discussion is terminated. Good day.[2017-3-24. : 12:39 am] Moose -- Oh, it's "common sense". So you don't need evidence for your arguments.[2017-3-24. : 12:39 am] zsnakezz -- within that wiggle room i think you could demand citations for people's actions, im making an idealistic argument[2017-3-24. : 12:38 am] zsnakezz -- of coarse viewing things at a more base value would be more efficient, but humanity demands privacy and time[2017-3-24. : 12:37 am] zsnakezz -- i really didn't say anything that can't be proved with common sense, if i was more specific in the argument perhaps it could be refuted[2017-3-24. : 12:29 am] zsnakezz -- also. it's mostly based on simple math, confirmation bias and anecdotes mean little in regards to some of these things[2017-3-24. : 12:26 am] Moose -- OK, so a combination of anecdotal evidence and confirmation bias, got it.[2017-3-24. : 12:26 am] zsnakezz -- that is on you, i made an educated argument that i believe to be true[2017-3-24. : 12:26 am] zsnakezz -- no, if you find value within the argument, you will seek your own proof |
, write assembly and C for embedded $y$tem$ and make fat $tack$