|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2017-5-13. : 4:43 am] m.0.n.3.y -- Question, do the terrain tiles create perfect squares? For example, if I make a square that is 22 tiles long and 22 tiles wide, is that a perfect square? It looks a little oblonged in the game[2017-5-13. : 4:41 am] m.0.n.3.y -- PauperPauper shouted: Hey all, I have a question. I have ~16 terran beacons in a row all assigned a location. I have all of them set to disable via switch but only half of them disable.. anyone know why that is happening? Maybe use more than one location?[2017-5-13. : 4:24 am] Pauper -- Hey all, I have a question. I have ~16 terran beacons in a row all assigned a location. I have all of them set to disable via switch but only half of them disable.. anyone know why that is happening?[2017-5-13. : 2:13 am] m.0.n.3.y -- Hey guys, I just finished my map 666 Defense Frozen, anyone want to play with me?[2017-5-13. : 1:37 am]  Lanthanide -- also I've found that background music adds an appropriate amount of dramatic effect to my life[2017-5-13. : 1:06 am]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- don't you keep spotlights right in front of your face at all time? It's great for dramatic effect[2017-5-13. : 1:04 am] Lanthanide -- for people to really look like that, they'd need to have little spotlights pointed at their cheeks and foreheads, while other parts were left in darkness, possibly even with the source of light being no more than 1 or 2 feet in front of their face to get the focus / contrast right[2017-5-13. : 12:50 am] Lanthanide -- not as 'painterly' obviously, but there's certain aspects that look similar: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/5e/fa/aa/5efaaa16a0d652646ccff9d5d0bd6d5a.jpg[2017-5-13. : 12:48 am] Lanthanide -- the SC:R portrait looks very similar in style to the D3 character portraits[2017-5-13. : 12:48 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- w/e, it's pretty alright. He seems to be looking left slightly more in the new one, so just say the face is at a different angle so it looks different. xD[2017-5-13. : 12:46 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- it's way different in SC2, but the new portrait it's not too bad[2017-5-13. : 12:45 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: his mustache though that's probably just another level-of-detail thing[2017-5-13. : 12:45 am]  NudeRaider -- ah okay it's subtle... overall it's the same, but the new one takes a downturn in sc:r while in sc1 the bending is only slight.[2017-5-13. : 12:42 am] NudeRaider -- Anyways, as I've been saying the only detail that is actually there in the original and isn't in the sc:r, is the oval head. Plus changed suit. Let me know if you see more.[2017-5-13. : 12:35 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- It'd be like making a hi-res version of what shape you see in a cloud[2017-5-13. : 12:35 am] NudeRaider -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: NudeRaider I guess that's true. And regardless, no matter what they do people will complain. xD exactly. And I'm *trying* to at least bring *some* objectivity into the debate... but so far everyone is just *nuuuu*  [2017-5-13. : 12:34 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: FaRTy1billion I'm not artsy enough to really be able to say, but I think just by adding details you automatically completely change the way the object is perceived. Maybe it's possible, but I imagine it to be super hard to add details that don't change the overall look of a smooth object or person. also that's a really good point, because due to lack of details everyone is going to perceive it differently, thus making what I just said more true[2017-5-13. : 12:34 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: FaRTy1billion I'm not artsy enough to really be able to say, but I think just by adding details you automatically completely change the way the object is perceived. Maybe it's possible, but I imagine it to be super hard to add details that don't change the overall look of a smooth object or person. I guess that's true. And regardless, no matter what they do people will complain. xD[2017-5-13. : 12:31 am] NudeRaider -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: they could've added more details without making him look totally different, but I blame SC2's art designers for that I'm not artsy enough to really be able to say, but I think just by adding details you automatically completely change the way the object is perceived. Maybe it's possible, but I imagine it to be super hard to add details that don't change the overall look of a smooth object or person.[2017-5-13. : 12:30 am] Moose -- lil-Infernolil-Inferno shouted: I'm 1-0 now O_O how many resets to get 1-0 tho[2017-5-13. : 12:28 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- they could've added more details without making him look totally different, but I blame SC2's art designers for that[2017-5-13. : 12:27 am] NudeRaider -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: NudeRaider Nude it doesn't bother you, maybe im botching this, that they essentially ret-conned they way he looked? oh and I'm also saying objectiveky he doesn't look *that* different from the original, they just added so many more details that you never saw before that it feels like a whole new person. Also the suit makes a big difference (and I'm totally okay with that one).[2017-5-13. : 12:26 am] Broflamingo -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: Broflamingo https://anticorruptionsociety.com/anatomy-of-a-con-job/con-2-oil-is-not-a-fossil-fuel-it-is-renewable/ That was the worst. You know guys have been saying russia can pump oil forever for years.[2017-5-13. : 12:25 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: FaRTy1billion To be fair Farty, depends on which strain of supporter you you are talking to. https://anticorruptionsociety.com/anatomy-of-a-con-job/con-2-oil-is-not-a-fossil-fuel-it-is-renewable/[2017-5-13. : 12:24 am] NudeRaider -- so yeah, while I'm not a fan of the retcon I gotta admit the sc:r raynor is how he should've been made 20 years ago. It's the old 'gotta stay true' vs 'gotta improve where you can' debate. And I must say I'm torn, but leaning to the 'gotta stay true' side.[2017-5-13. : 12:24 am] Broflamingo -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: Broflamingo https://media.giphy.com/media/12Vg35jCqP610Y/giphy.gif Well played, well played farty...[2017-5-13. : 12:23 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: NudeRaider Nude it doesn't bother you, maybe im botching this, that they essentially ret-conned they way he looked? https://media.giphy.com/media/12Vg35jCqP610Y/giphy.gif[2017-5-13. : 12:21 am] Broflamingo -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: I thought that was already well established To be fair Farty, depends on which strain of supporter you you are talking to.[2017-5-13. : 12:21 am] NudeRaider -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: NudeRaider Nude it doesn't bother you, maybe im botching this, that they essentially ret-conned they way he looked? Well as I said, I see good things and bad things. The good: added detail. The bad: changed parts they didn't have to.[2017-5-13. : 12:19 am] Broflamingo -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Dem0n I think it's because they got rid of the egg shaped head. Gave him a more soldier-y look, a more angular face, defined bones and such. At the original low quality we had none of these so it looked like a babyface, even if that wasn't how he was *supposed* to look back then. So... I think they should've kept the recognizable egghead, but I'm okay with giving him more bone structure and such. So I'm so-so with the new portrait Nude it doesn't bother you, maybe im botching this, that they essentially ret-conned they way he looked?[2017-5-13. : 12:18 am] Broflamingo -- I think its scientific fact if you use the term "Lamestream Media" you are over 40yo[2017-5-13. : 12:18 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: jjf28 jj im pretty sure that interview was grounds for obstruction of justice. But you know "MSM LOLOL" or "fake news" it's not fake, it's just alternative[2017-5-13. : 12:18 am] NudeRaider -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: NudeRaider He looks like Shepard from Mass Effect I think it's because they got rid of the egg shaped head. Gave him a more soldier-y look, a more angular face, defined bones and such. At the original low quality we had none of these so it looked like a babyface, even if that wasn't how he was *supposed* to look back then. So... I think they should've kept the recognizable egghead, but I'm okay with giving him more bone structure and such. So I'm so-so with the new portrait[2017-5-13. : 12:16 am] Broflamingo -- jjf28 jj im pretty sure that interview was grounds for obstruction of justice. But you know "MSM LOLOL" or "fake news" [2017-5-13. : 12:14 am] Dem0n -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: I thought he meant they literally should be dead because of their health and diet choices LMAO that too LMAO[2017-5-13. : 12:13 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: I thought he meant they literally should be dead because of their health and diet choices LMAO this is also what I thought[2017-5-13. : 12:12 am] Lanthanide -- JackJack shouted: I'm not in the US but from what I see of it from here there seems to not actually be many white supremacists or crazy left-wing SJW types, most people are more moderate. Have you a pfft, every 4th family is composed of gun-toting white-supremicists[2017-5-13. : 12:10 am] Moose -- I thought he meant they literally should be dead because of their health and diet choices LMAO[2017-5-13. : 12:09 am] NudeRaider -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: NudeRaider He looks like Shepard from Mass Effect  true[2017-5-13. : 12:07 am] Dem0n -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Dem0n new sc1 raynorold sc1 raynor vs sc2 raynor Looking at these in direct comparison, the sc:r raynor looks A LOT more like the original sc1 raynor than the sc2 raynor. Although I gotta admit they got rid of the goofy "innocence/clueless"-look. While I understand that this irritates people that have known him like that for 20 years, I also think it would've been more appropriate to picture him that (new) way in the first place. He looks like Shepard from Mass Effect[2017-5-13. : 12:03 am] NudeRaider -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: NudeRaider pretty sure they're borderline pedophiles oh? Guess I'm not paying enough attention to people's views. FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: I thought they were just bronies or whatever ya[2017-5-12. : 11:59 pm] NudeRaider -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: smfh this is Raynor's new portrait? new sc1 raynorold sc1 raynor vs sc2 raynor Looking at these in direct comparison, the sc:r raynor looks A LOT more like the original sc1 raynor than the sc2 raynor. Although I gotta admit they got rid of the goofy "innocence/clueless"-look. While I understand that this irritates people that have known him like that for 20 years, I also think it would've been more appropriate to picture him that (new) way in the first place.[2017-5-12. : 11:53 pm] lil-Inferno -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: NudeRaider pretty sure they're borderline pedophiles borderline is an understatement[2017-5-12. : 11:51 pm] Dem0n -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Dem0n O.o never saw them as that bad... pretty sure they're borderline pedophiles[2017-5-12. : 11:49 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- when there's only like 8 active people on SEN it's hard to see how cliquish we are/used to be xD[2017-5-12. : 11:46 pm] NudeRaider -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: Broflamingo DM and Lingie should be dead tbh O.o never saw them as that bad...[2017-5-12. : 11:45 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: his language is hard to transcribe ugh just put "[pulling-flags-from-nose gesture]" and that's all you need to know[2017-5-12. : 11:44 pm] NudeRaider -- JackJack shouted: This video contains content from BBC Worldwide, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds. ya for me as well... just as the KKK song. Like what's the reason?  Luckily there's a ton of easy ways around it.[2017-5-12. : 11:44 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Mini Moose 2707 I'd rather have seen more of pauper in that discussion. It's easy to talk to someone who already agrees with you. What's hard is to try and understand a position of someone who doesn't agree with you. And from what I saw from Pauper he just gave up and said he doesn't agree, but there has been very little in the way of WHY he thinks the way he thinks. ya, I thought he was pretty much just shot down, but idk if that's better than a 14-page meme war |
Members Online: grasutzz