|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2017-12-10. : 2:27 am] Broflamingo -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: What are you compiling with? C:\Users\Doflamingo D. Pierre\Desktop\C++ Projects\4.2 Assgn Val to Array\main.cpp|3|error: 'constexpr' does not name a type|[2017-12-10. : 2:27 am] Broflamingo -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: What are you compiling with? warning: identifier 'constexpr' is a keyword in C++11 [-Wc++0x-compat]|[2017-12-10. : 2:26 am] Broflamingo -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: Probably what jjf said or if you're using an old version of g++ or something you might have to compile explicitly specifying you're using C++11 Using codelockbs C++11 is enabled, already did it in the settings. Not sure what is wrong,[2017-12-10. : 2:22 am]  Voyager7456 -- Probably what jjf said or if you're using an old version of g++ or something you might have to compile explicitly specifying you're using C++11[2017-12-10. : 2:22 am] Broflamingo -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: What's the error you're getting? Does not name a type[2017-12-10. : 1:54 am] jjf28 -- also if you're calling it from main you need to either have it written above the main method or declared above the main method[2017-12-10. : 1:52 am] jjf28 -- to take your quoted code very literally, there should be a semicolon after the last number[2017-12-10. : 1:50 am] Broflamingo -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: yes Declaring it outside of int main() btw[2017-12-10. : 1:49 am] Broflamingo -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: yes Noob question voy: constexpr int Square(int number) {return number*number} cannot compile keeps giving an error why?[2017-12-09. : 9:55 pm] jjf28 -- I decided to cut out a large tangent into moral philosophy, but it's a fun topic https://youtu.be/5VmLQjdT7IA  [2017-12-09. : 9:52 pm] Broflamingo -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: Broflamingo it's just used as an example of how such a judgement is subjective and shouldn't be asserted as fact... unless we attach some common standards and goals (which is tricky in politics and can't simply be implied - some people are simply conditioned to have certain standards and goals, some people arrive at them erroneously, most have some more fundamental beliefs that could feasibly be used to change their political measures) and either agree how well he's doing on them or can argue with good evidence (again, tricky in politics, but that's what non-partisan expert analysis is for) how well he's doing on those measures. Understood.[2017-12-09. : 9:50 pm] jjf28 -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: jjf28 Honest question: Is that not so fringe and factional, i.e Nazi, that its irrelevant to bring it up? To be fair 30-35% is still a third of the country, meh maybe im splitting hairs. it's just used as an example of how such a judgement is subjective and shouldn't be asserted as fact... unless we attach some common standards and goals (which is tricky in politics and can't simply be implied - some people are simply conditioned to have certain standards and goals, some people arrive at them erroneously, most have some more fundamental beliefs that could feasibly be used to change their political measures) and either agree how well he's doing on them or can argue with good evidence (again, tricky in politics, but that's what non-partisan expert analysis is for) how well he's doing on those measures.[2017-12-09. : 9:06 pm]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: FaRTy1billion actually it says it isn't necessarily irrational. It says that personal gain is not always the biggest motivator for people. Makes only sense if you read the article in the context of the introduction: He wants to put a stop to the mindless bandwagoning that declares Trump voters irrational. He tries to find the real reasons they voted for him. I just meant he compared liberals volunteering to conservatives military services as examples against monetary gain, except military service absolutely has monetary gain[2017-12-09. : 8:46 pm] NudeRaider -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: that part is talking about like it is rational to do something that does not provide monetary gain because it expresses your values or something, idk actually it says it isn't necessarily irrational. It says that personal gain is not always the biggest motivator for people. Makes only sense if you read the article in the context of the introduction: He wants to put a stop to the mindless bandwagoning that declares Trump voters irrational. He tries to find the real reasons they voted for him.[2017-12-09. : 8:42 pm] NudeRaider -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: NudeRaider ya, a bunch of those I was like "What? That doesn't even make sense", then I remembered people on TV and whatever xD lets say a lot of them are not as clear cut as climate.[2017-12-09. : 8:23 pm] Broflamingo -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: not a cop out, a simple recognition of the subjective nature of the word "good", if you're a nazi, I'm sure you're quite happy with the man in the office Honest question: Is that not so fringe and factional, i.e Nazi, that its irrelevant to bring it up? To be fair 30-35% is still a third of the country, meh maybe im splitting hairs.[2017-12-09. : 8:20 pm] Broflamingo -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: that said it's my opinion that he is terrible, and take just about any typical measure applied to a president and he'll fall flat on his face Fair enough.[2017-12-09. : 8:20 pm] jjf28 -- that said it's my opinion that he is terrible, and take just about any typical measure applied to a president and he'll fall flat on his face[2017-12-09. : 8:19 pm] jjf28 -- not a cop out, a simple recognition of the subjective nature of the word "good", if you're a nazi, I'm sure you're quite happy with the man in the office[2017-12-09. : 8:16 pm] Broflamingo -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: Broflamingo oh, depends on the metric Pr0nogo Pr0nogo shouted: I don't think most people are corrupt, I think we mostly have different ideas of how to get to a better future, but vitriol is easier than prolonged dialogue At least Clinton, who is terrible, knows something about the world, the intricacies of policy, domestic and national. If she doesn't you get the feeling she would get someone who would. Trump is just intellectually bankrupt, he has no skin in the game. His policies are just phrases and platitudes to feed red meat to the base, and those are even botched when they come out of his mouth. Left, right, center, up, down....you have to be wary of guy who is a complete moron taking the helm of civilization, imagine if something truly terrible happened like a pandemic or something this moron would be the leader![2017-12-09. : 8:13 pm] Broflamingo -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: Broflamingo oh, depends on the metric Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: I don't think most people are corrupt, I think we mostly have different ideas of how to get to a better future, but vitriol is easier than prolonged dialogue These are cop-outs. Trump is terrible, there is no middle ground here. There is nothing good about Trump, maybe hes entertaining when talking shit, but if you hear him talk there is nothing intelligent coming out of his sentences. He struggles just to put generic sentences together.[2017-12-09. : 7:18 pm]  Pr0nogo -- I don't think most people are corrupt, I think we mostly have different ideas of how to get to a better future, but vitriol is easier than prolonged dialogue[2017-12-09. : 7:03 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- ZoanZoan shouted: Man, this conversation about politics is still going haha it's always going[2017-12-09. : 6:57 pm] Moose -- But the data not necessarily even good anyway so it's a all a meme LMAO[2017-12-09. : 6:54 pm] Moose -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: which is probably true, it's just easy to nit-pick the specific examples xD Pretty much. Someone pulls out data, instinct is to defend and discredit it with some anecdote.[2017-12-09. : 6:52 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- which is probably true, it's just easy to nit-pick the specific examples xD[2017-12-09. : 6:52 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- except these are all just as examples of "people from both sides think and do dumb stuff, neither is any more likely"[2017-12-09. : 6:48 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- part of why my brother joined was for dat cash and they pay for education and stuff, which is *absolutely* for monetary benefit xD[2017-12-09. : 6:48 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- the examples just didn't seem balanced because, while it might not pay the best or be optimal, military *does* pay you and you get veteran benefits and stuff[2017-12-09. : 6:47 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- that part is talking about like it is rational to do something that does not provide monetary gain because it expresses your values or something, idk[2017-12-09. : 6:43 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Except he compared it to volunteering, where you don't get paid at all. Not to mention in military you also don't pay for housing etc.[2017-12-09. : 6:42 pm] Moose -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: "conservatives joining the military are often also choosing their values over monetary reward" except you get paid in the military .. ? Military pay sucks until you get in years and promotions. (Housing allowance nice tho.)[2017-12-09. : 6:41 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: "liberals tend to deny the overwhelming consensus in psychological science that intelligence is moderately heritable." really? I don't know many people that would deny that intelligence is at least partly grounded in genetics... ya, a bunch of those I was like "What? That doesn't even make sense", then I remembered people on TV and whatever xD[2017-12-09. : 6:40 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- "conservatives joining the military are often also choosing their values over monetary reward" except you get paid in the military .. ?[2017-12-09. : 6:23 pm] zsnakezz -- instead of you know, concentrating those things into a small group of people with high status and more value etc[2017-12-09. : 6:22 pm] zsnakezz -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: "liberals tend to deny the overwhelming consensus in psychological science that intelligence is moderately heritable." really? I don't know many people that would deny that intelligence is at least partly grounded in genetics... i don't think liberals deny any of that, I think a part of the reason they are liberal are so those traits eventually get more evened out[2017-12-09. : 5:40 pm] NudeRaider -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: Mini Moose 2707 but how to convince people their metrics are shit? it's a tricky business http://quillette.com/2017/09/28/trump-voters-irrational/ damn good read. Too good. Too taxing and thought inspiring. I'm halfway through and I need to take a break.[2017-12-09. : 5:07 pm] jjf28 -- yea that point stuck out to me too, but *shrug* his field of expertise[2017-12-09. : 5:06 pm] NudeRaider -- "liberals tend to deny the overwhelming consensus in psychological science that intelligence is moderately heritable." really? I don't know many people that would deny that intelligence is at least partly grounded in genetics...[2017-12-09. : 4:57 pm] Dem0n -- probably. what even is that? Sie was getting on when his ports weren't forwarded[2017-12-09. : 4:20 pm] Moose -- If you think memes are killing political discourse, wait until you see the media LMAO[2017-12-09. : 4:12 pm] Moose -- Nah, just gonna talk shit because it's fun and easy and polarization sells.[2017-12-09. : 4:10 pm] jjf28 -- in many cases I think we could approach someone from Trumps base, find some common morals or goals, and build to some positive action; gotta first ensure you're on solid epistemic ground and avoid insulting/alienating them though  [2017-12-09. : 3:34 pm] jjf28 -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: jjf28 Ya, scoring pretty well, on the metric of SHITTINESS. but how to convince people their metrics are shit? it's a tricky business http://quillette.com/2017/09/28/trump-voters-irrational/[2017-12-09. : 2:42 pm] Moose -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: "These guys cannot govern, the answer to everything is prayers and taxcuts." I honestly wonder sometimes if the "prayers" is just a ruse to gain public favor Jesus was a commie anyway.[2017-12-09. : 2:35 pm] Moose -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: Broflamingo oh, depends on the metric Ya, scoring pretty well, on the metric of SHITTINESS.[2017-12-09. : 11:18 am] jjf28 -- he's definitely set some records, most all of which I don't personally consider "good" (and a ton of which he himself criticized Obama for) but which measures are "good" is assuredly a subjective judgement[2017-12-09. : 11:12 am] jjf28 -- BroflamingoBroflamingo shouted: Zoan Zoan He's not a good president by any metric. He's consistently polled below 35% post inaugration day. He also lost the popular vote. Let's be clear here, I think its safe to say at polling below 35% hes a factional leader, not the actual leader of the United States. oh, depends on the metric [2017-12-09. : 8:05 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- "These guys cannot govern, the answer to everything is prayers and taxcuts." I honestly wonder sometimes if the "prayers" is just a ruse to gain public favor[2017-12-09. : 7:29 am] Broflamingo -- Trickle Down Economics has already been debunked and discredited, its trash. However the conservative are devoid of any ideas at the this point, the cult of saint ronnie lives on. These guys cannot govern, the answer to everything is prayers and taxcuts.[2017-12-09. : 7:28 am] Broflamingo -- P.S With that 1.5 Trillion tax cut to the rich, you could do a couple of things with that: Forgive all college debt, Single Payer health Care, Complete Overhaul of U.S infrastructure (This would create so many jobs). Left or Right, we all know taxcuts to the wealthy or welfare for the rich does nothing to stimulate economic growth they pocket the money. Corporations will just pocket the profits from the cuts. This does nothing but drive the debt up and give an excuse to cut the social safety net. |
Members Online: Roy
Roy