|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2014-9-06. : 7:20 pm]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- So really there are 6 ... except two are negations of the others, which brings it down to 3.  [2014-9-06. : 7:19 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Oh, and two of the 8 of binary are what I labelled as 'always' and 'never' ... A ? B = 1 or A ? B = 0, regardless of value[2014-9-06. : 7:18 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- or like False ? False = Indeterminate, otherwise the rest are false[2014-9-06. : 7:18 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- most of them are stupid ... like A ? B = 1 if A is 1 and B is -1, otherwise the rest are false[2014-9-06. : 6:57 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- aaa, making an exhaustive list of possible binary gates, there are 8 (excluding ones where A ? B and B ? A would have different results)... for ternary there are 729. I don't want to list all of these :C[2014-9-06. : 6:50 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- JackJack shouted: transistors which are 1, 0, and both 1 and 0 That's baiscally what the '0' state is. It's simultaneously true and false.[2014-9-06. : 6:18 pm]  Oh_Man -- synchronised fap failure. scientists only ever theorised it was possible... until now[2014-9-06. : 5:03 pm]  Devourer -- Sand WraithSand Wraith shouted: magic boxes need to fuck off with their zeros get rekt m8[2014-9-06. : 3:22 pm] Moose -- paynepayne shouted: Mini Moose 2707 who won, though? Technically I did, but in our different time zones, we did about the same [2014-9-06. : 3:04 pm] payne -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Me and Jack were not masturbating for 180 days, but we both goofed around the same time. XD who won, though?[2014-9-06. : 3:01 pm] payne -- Oh_ManOh_Man shouted: watch this moose bahaha: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu73ng-W60o  [2014-9-06. : 3:00 pm] payne -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Me and Jack were not masturbating for 180 days, but we both goofed around the same time. XD oh come on... you guys lasted how many days? pathetic.[2014-9-06. : 2:59 pm] payne -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: let's do it again lel you lost?  [2014-9-06. : 2:37 pm] lil-Inferno -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Jack, we both at Day 1, because we scrubs, let Noobs C|X^ D[2014-9-06. : 2:30 pm] Devourer -- RoyRoy shouted: You could make the signature with a max width and max height and set the overflow to hidden. yeah I guess. At some cases this may be annoying though.[2014-9-06. : 2:17 pm] Oh_Man -- as long as it wasn't something from http://www.staredit.net/topic/2871/ ... then we know we have a problem[2014-9-06. : 2:16 pm] Oh_Man -- watch this moose bahaha: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu73ng-W60o[2014-9-06. : 2:14 pm] Moose -- Me and Jack were not masturbating for 180 days, but we both goofed around the same time. XD[2014-9-06. : 2:14 pm] Roy -- You could make the signature with a max width and max height and set the overflow to hidden.[2014-9-06. : 1:31 pm] Devourer -- Well coding this whole thing was -mostly- very fun and interesting to be honest. Also, since the staff has the power to remove signatures on demand I may remove the concept of "signatue-image" and just allow the img-tag as BBCode in the text signature again[2014-9-06. : 1:26 pm] Oh_Man -- at the very least couldn't we have an image AND text as well? since we can't yet hyper link images[2014-9-06. : 1:25 pm] Oh_Man -- i'm sayin keep up the good work, i'm sure it's a pain in the arse - but someone's gotta do it[2014-9-06. : 1:23 pm] Devourer -- Yeah old images are scaled to 100x100 or sth; I am going to look into the parser when I get back at my apartment (in little more than a week probably)[2014-9-06. : 1:23 pm] Devourer -- I can not reliably check the size of an entire signature via php as far as I know (checking the size of a div, that is). Probably via JS and then tell the server via AJAX this, but meh, appears to be an overkill.[2014-9-06. : 1:22 pm] Oh_Man -- see that link? is there any way to make all the images on it not resized and squashed and crap - or is that just not possible with the new SEN?[2014-9-06. : 1:22 pm] Oh_Man -- surely it is possible to impose that same limitation on BB code as well? bah - i'm not fluent with these things[2014-9-06. : 1:20 pm] Devourer -- in v5, you would put like a 8000x4000 pixels bitmap image in a signature, even more of them if you like. They get resized as in reduced while browsing (but remain clickable) but the loadspeed would be shit.[2014-9-06. : 1:20 pm] Devourer -- Well. Enabling it would make the "Signautre Image" concept superfluous; also I would have to check extra dimensions of images used in signatures via [img]tags[2014-9-06. : 1:19 pm] Oh_Man -- having a clickable image on forum signatures is, like, some sort of internet rule!! right??[2014-9-06. : 1:19 pm] Oh_Man -- damnit devourer, it wasnt b4 - i thought this was spposed to be an UPGRADE[2014-9-06. : 1:14 pm] Sacrieur -- thanks to Blizzard's broken system on b.net, you can troll the lobby by creating a game and then it forces people to join it[2014-9-06. : 12:19 pm] Oh_Man -- still can't get it to work on signature, but does work on threads - however, it resizes them - sometimes not well, makes them look all squashed and shit[2014-9-06. : 12:16 pm] Oh_Man -- i think something is fucked with the image in general - can't get them to work anywhere |
Members Online: MobMob, IskatuMesk
IskatuMesk