Members in Shoutbox
None.

Shoutbox Search
Search for:


Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper
/me > Marks as action

Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
Pages: < 1 « 3332 3333 3334 3335 33363570 >

[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Devourer -- RTS > MOBA
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Arkane -- I'm mostly exclusive to RTS
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Devourer -- You can run away from heroes with no worries at all
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Arkane -- I dont even play MOBAs
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Devourer -- Basically, every spell in LoL is limited to like, approximated, 300 pixels at most
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Arkane -- :^)
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Devourer -- HoN as in action and graphics, to me, is superior to LoL
[2014-10-07. : 2:47 am]
Arkane -- Heroes of Newerth is LoL for hipsters
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Devourer -- I wished S2 wasn't so incredibly incompetent to balance a game.
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Arkane -- NO MANA FFS
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Arkane -- NO IM MID
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Arkane -- GONNA GO MID
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Arkane -- STUN STUN STUN
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Arkane -- league of legends is where its at
[2014-10-07. : 2:46 am]
Arkane -- starcraft is worst game 2014
[2014-10-07. : 2:45 am]
Moose -- Disclaimer: may or may not be the most efficient method
[2014-10-07. : 2:45 am]
Moose -- Use A-1
[2014-10-07. : 2:37 am]
MasterJohnny -- Suppose A is nxn and nonsingular and B is nxm how do I efficiently solve AX=B
[2014-10-07. : 2:30 am]
Dem0n -- l)ark_ssj9kevin
l)ark_ssj9kevin shouted: if you haven't made your OWN shortcut keys, you don't truly know all the shortcut keys.
I have not. I'm still using shift+insert to paste D:
[2014-10-07. : 2:27 am]
jjf28 -- rofl the van idea (if you've seen the new big bang theory) :lol:
[2014-10-07. : 2:03 am]
Moose -- But yeah, try xemacs instead.
[2014-10-07. : 2:00 am]
Moose -- It's true, if only because there are too damn many in that program.
[2014-10-07. : 1:57 am]
l)ark_ssj9kevin -- if you haven't made your OWN shortcut keys, you don't truly know all the shortcut keys.
[2014-10-07. : 1:54 am]
Moose -- You just mad you don't know all the shortcut keys.
[2014-10-07. : 1:53 am]
l)ark_ssj9kevin -- why are you using emacs
[2014-10-07. : 1:41 am]
Dem0n -- Emacs is such a piece of shit.
[2014-10-07. : 1:34 am]
jjf28 -- void pointer to memory, defined offsets, duh :P
[2014-10-07. : 1:30 am]
Roy -- Or, more importantly, how you'd try to manage an array of groups of variables without using structs.
[2014-10-07. : 1:08 am]
jjf28 -- (was going to say "then think how ugly a function call with that would be" but that's not what you meant by not seeing a diff :) )
[2014-10-07. : 1:05 am]
Dem0n -- Oh, didn't see the full picture
[2014-10-07. : 1:05 am]
jjf28 -- imagine if your struct would otherwise be 8 variables
[2014-10-07. : 1:04 am]
Dem0n -- I don't see a difference between using structs and not using them
[2014-10-07. : 1:00 am]
jjf28 -- meh
[2014-10-07. : 1:00 am]
jjf28 -- woops, failed with semicolons
[2014-10-07. : 1:00 am]
jjf28 -- http://puu.sh/c2mpt/ad13ab85ff.png
[2014-10-07. : 1:00 am]
jjf28 -- disregard last picture
[2014-10-07. : 12:59 am]
jjf28 -- woops
[2014-10-07. : 12:59 am]
jjf28 -- http://puu.sh/c2mkz/1c18e84bb9.png
[2014-10-07. : 12:57 am]
jjf28 -- http://puu.sh/c2meW/1591bab15c.png
[2014-10-07. : 12:52 am]
trgk -- struct = Merge multiple variables into one.
[2014-10-07. : 12:49 am]
Dem0n -- someone teach me wtf structs in C are pls
[2014-10-07. : 12:43 am]
jjf28 -- awake for 32 hours, brain has reached mush max
[2014-10-06. : 10:32 pm]
Moose -- Yeah, you can optionally add a "rekt" after the GG.
[2014-10-06. : 10:29 pm]
Jack -- tyrannasaurus rekt :wob:
[2014-10-06. : 10:03 pm]
Moose -- Proof by contradiction. Assume x > 0 does not imply (1/x) > 0, then x > 0 must imply (1/x) <= 0. Since x > 0, you can multiply both sides by x without reversing the inequality, so (1/x) * x <= 0 * x. Since x != 0, that becomes 1 <= 0. Contradiction, GG. ∎
[2014-10-06. : 9:29 pm]
Moose -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: btw, how do you prove [ x > 0 ] => [ (1/x) > 0 ]
Uh, did you try multiplying both sides by x? :P
[2014-10-06. : 9:24 pm]
KrayZee -- :wob:
[2014-10-06. : 8:31 pm]
jjf28 -- i*
[2014-10-06. : 8:23 pm]
Generalpie -- 1V + 1 = V
[2014-10-06. : 8:23 pm]
Generalpie -- 111+ 1 = 1V
[2014-10-06. : 8:23 pm]
Generalpie -- 11 + 1 = 111
[2014-10-06. : 8:22 pm]
Generalpie -- 1+ 1 = 11
[2014-10-06. : 7:20 pm]
Zoan -- you'd have to prove that too D:
[2014-10-06. : 7:18 pm]
sigsaucy -- 1/x^2 * x = x/x^2 = 1/x
[2014-10-06. : 7:17 pm]
Zoan -- but why is 1/x^2 * x = 1/x ?
[2014-10-06. : 7:16 pm]
sigsaucy -- x > 0 <====> 1/x^2 * x > 1/x^2 * 0 <====> 1/x > 0
[2014-10-06. : 7:10 pm]
sigsaucy -- x > 0 => 1/x^2 x > 1/x^2 0 => 1/x > 0
[2014-10-06. : 6:54 pm]
Zoan -- I feel like there's a simpler way to do this though..
[2014-10-06. : 6:52 pm]
Zoan -- ohhh, I need to specify that 1/(x*x) > 0
[2014-10-06. : 6:46 pm]
Zoan -- don't see why not though
[2014-10-06. : 6:45 pm]
Zoan -- I have no idea if I'm allowed to define a multiplicative inverse (1/(x*x)) for (x*x)
[2014-10-06. : 6:44 pm]
Zoan -- so (1/x) > 0
[2014-10-06. : 6:44 pm]
Zoan -- so (x*x)*(1/x) > 0, => (x*x)*(1/(x*x))*(1/x) > 0*(1/(x*x))
[2014-10-06. : 6:43 pm]
Zoan -- Wait, actually just the left side. then I used multiplicative associativity to change it to (x*x)*(1/x) > 0 * (x*(1/x))
[2014-10-06. : 6:42 pm]
jjf28 -- you're not multiplying against 0 are you?
[2014-10-06. : 6:42 pm]
Zoan -- hrm, I multiplied both sides by x(1/x)
[2014-10-06. : 6:40 pm]
jjf28 -- of the right equation that is
[2014-10-06. : 6:39 pm]
jjf28 -- i'd start by adding one to both sides
[2014-10-06. : 6:38 pm]
Zoan -- btw, how do you prove [ x > 0 ] => [ (1/x) > 0 ]

Pages: < 1 « 3332 3333 3334 3335 33363570 >


Members Online: jun3hong, Excalibur