|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2016-11-10. : 5:01 am]  Fire_Kame -- well that's unfortunate, because that's part of critical thinking you dumb fuck[2016-11-10. : 5:00 am]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- it's probably not the best way, but I don't see you thinking up something better to bridge poverty and racial gaps[2016-11-10. : 5:00 am] CecilSunkure -- I don't care what it's "trying to do". What it *is doing* is what matters to me[2016-11-10. : 5:00 am] Fire_Kame -- I'm not even arguing for affirmative action or diversity hires. I legitimately just feel bad you don't know how to read statistical analysis[2016-11-10. : 4:59 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- It's trying to remedy the lasting consequences of segregation ;o Minorities were pushed to the ghettos which are still socioeconomic sinkholes where education and jobs are lacking, and it's to create opportunity to end the cycle[2016-11-10. : 4:59 am] Fire_Kame -- I legitimately feel bad for your frail ego that it impacts your ability to critically read[2016-11-10. : 4:58 am] CecilSunkure -- Alright I'm ganna go now Kame. Me and the patriarchy are going to plot how best to control you[2016-11-10. : 4:58 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: Whatever quoting that article is only going to make it worse because it's slanting it in the first place[2016-11-10. : 4:57 am] Fire_Kame -- "It uses the term “bonus” to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant's race is worth." from the article[2016-11-10. : 4:56 am] CecilSunkure -- No, it's a boost kame. It only applies to certain CA schools, but still. What the fuck lol[2016-11-10. : 4:56 am] Fire_Kame -- it's a metaphorical boost Cecil. They didn't literally give someone extra points. It's more about how race weights statistics differently[2016-11-10. : 4:55 am] CecilSunkure -- CA is ridiculously racist, because SJW attitude is ridiculously racist, and the politics of CA follow the culture of SJWs[2016-11-10. : 4:54 am] CecilSunkure -- Looks like it's a smaller deduction now, 50, but there's a huge boost if you're black[2016-11-10. : 4:53 am] CecilSunkure -- https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/02/28/asians-penalized-50-points-on-sat-black-students-given-230-bonus-points/[2016-11-10. : 4:53 am] CecilSunkure -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: Ahli It's to try and bridge the race gap ... Just like Soviet Russia tried to meet their coal and iron quotas -- by mistreating their citizens.[2016-11-10. : 4:52 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- AhliAhli shouted: CecilSunkure CecilSunkure is that true? that's a quite racist system... It's to try and bridge the race gap[2016-11-10. : 4:51 am] Ahli -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: If you're black, your SAT scores will be boosted. Social justice at its finest CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: For example in CA if you're asian your SAT scores will be dropped. That's social justice in action is that true? that's a quite racist system...[2016-11-10. : 4:42 am] CecilSunkure -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: wait, what the fuck does Russia have to do with anything? I'm mocking them with a reference to socialism and meeting quotas through barbaric means, like artificially modifying SAT scores to even out the averages across ethnicities[2016-11-10. : 4:41 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- wait, what the fuck does Russia have to do with anything?[2016-11-10. : 4:41 am] CecilSunkure -- Gotta meet those quotas like Soviet Russia and the iron race![2016-11-10. : 4:41 am] CecilSunkure -- If you're black, your SAT scores will be boosted. Social justice at its finest[2016-11-10. : 4:40 am] CecilSunkure -- For example in CA if you're asian your SAT scores will be dropped. That's social justice in action[2016-11-10. : 4:39 am] CecilSunkure -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: also, I don't know why your going on about SJW. Who even pays attention to them? lol SJWs run the politics of CA. So if you have to deal with CA chances are you might care a lot[2016-11-10. : 4:39 am] CecilSunkure -- Maybe they should have a stronger sense of identity that isn't ingrained in their social subscriptions. Then their feelings wouldn't be so hurt[2016-11-10. : 4:38 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- also, I don't know why your going on about SJW. Who even pays attention to them? lol[2016-11-10. : 4:38 am] CecilSunkure -- And it's not my fault if social justice warriors place their personal identity in their social justiceness, and feel like I am attacking who they are[2016-11-10. : 4:38 am] KrayZee -- Trump supporters literally said they would rather have the next Hitler than Clinton[2016-11-10. : 4:37 am] CecilSunkure -- Fire_KameFire_Kame shouted: you want other people to feel bad about who they are because someone at sometime made you feel bad. That is also a shitty opinion To be clear there's a difference (at least a difference that I care about) between choices and "who you are". Nobody should feel bad for things they cannot control. But if a social justice warrior makes a choice I think is bad, I want them to feel bad for it[2016-11-10. : 4:32 am] CecilSunkure -- EchoEcho shouted: Cecil did you graduate from digipen yet Never will[2016-11-10. : 4:31 am] CecilSunkure -- Fire_KameFire_Kame shouted: you're a shitty person At least I don't make factually inaccurate claims about you, and then attack you for it[2016-11-10. : 4:30 am] CecilSunkure -- Fire_KameFire_Kame shouted: you want other people to feel bad about who they are because someone at sometime made you feel bad. That is also a shitty opinion I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting people to feel bad for their choices[2016-11-10. : 4:29 am] Fire_Kame -- you want other people to feel bad about who they are because someone at sometime made you feel bad. That is also a shitty opinion[2016-11-10. : 4:29 am] Fire_Kame -- okay, if you really feel that strongly about rejecting that statement[2016-11-10. : 4:29 am] CecilSunkure -- Kame made an assumption of mutual exclusion when it just doesn't factually exist[2016-11-10. : 4:27 am] CecilSunkure -- Being against Anti-X is not mutually exclusive with being Anti-X[2016-11-10. : 4:26 am] CecilSunkure -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: CecilSunkure except that's not like a real thing with tangible consequence ;o Yeah, and the not-realness makes it very clear that the logic I am presenting does not contain mutual-exclusion[2016-11-10. : 4:26 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: For example, I think anti-alien invasion nuts are annoying. However, I am not pro-alien invasion except that's not like a real thing with tangible consequence ;o[2016-11-10. : 4:25 am] CecilSunkure -- For example, I think anti-alien invasion nuts are annoying. However, I am not pro-alien invasion[2016-11-10. : 4:25 am] Fire_Kame -- so we're all clear that Cecil is upset about the loss of power resulting in genitals[2016-11-10. : 4:25 am] Fire_Kame -- Soz moose...I said what I wanted to say. I really just wanted to literally define patriarchy[2016-11-10. : 4:24 am] Fire_Kame -- "I think social justice warriors, reddit, twitter, facebook, and the social internet in general deserves their collective feelings to be hurt." deserves because....they're anti-patriarchy[2016-11-10. : 4:24 am] Fire_Kame -- "...and happy the anti-patriarchy and anti-white attitude is taking a huge beating"[2016-11-10. : 4:23 am] CecilSunkure -- How is me saying I'm glad peoples' feelings are hurt patriarchal[2016-11-10. : 4:22 am] CecilSunkure -- I don't think I've ever even said patriarchy on this website until now[2016-11-10. : 4:22 am] Fire_Kame -- the literal definition. The thing you are literally defending in your post[2016-11-10. : 4:22 am] Fire_Kame -- the literal definition of patriarchy the literal definition is the elder male leads the tribe |