|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2016-11-11. : 10:25 pm]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- RoyRoy shouted: MasterJohnny Blame the person that reported you. Lite Discussion isn't a place for unfounded hyperbole: if you believe we should abolish the electoral college, you should at least explain why, or even how. Suggesting a task that is politically impossible is something more suited to the Shoutbox, or maybe in a Null discussion. RoyRoy shouted: Corbo Blame the person that reported you. Lite Discussion isn't a place for unfounded hyperbole: if you believe we're headed for a nuclear winter, you should at least explain why, or even how. Suggesting a task that is politically impossible is something more suited to the Shoutbox, or maybe in a Null discussion. but without hyperbole, what's the point of saying anything at all?  [2016-11-11. : 9:37 pm] Moose -- CorboCorbo shouted: He was an asshole to me so I reported all one liner posts too mad AF [2016-11-11. : 9:37 pm] Moose -- MasterJohnnyMasterJohnny shouted: Damn it roy that was not a joke we really should abolish the electoral college mad AF[2016-11-11. : 9:37 pm]  Roy -- CorboCorbo shouted: He was an asshole to me so I reported all one liner posts too Blame the person that reported you. Lite Discussion isn't a place for unfounded hyperbole: if you believe we're headed for a nuclear winter, you should at least explain why, or even how. Suggesting a task that is politically impossible is something more suited to the Shoutbox, or maybe in a Null discussion.[2016-11-11. : 9:36 pm] Roy -- MasterJohnnyMasterJohnny shouted: Damn it roy that was not a joke we really should abolish the electoral college Blame the person that reported you. Lite Discussion isn't a place for unfounded hyperbole: if you believe we should abolish the electoral college, you should at least explain why, or even how. Suggesting a task that is politically impossible is something more suited to the Shoutbox, or maybe in a Null discussion.[2016-11-11. : 9:29 pm] Moose -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Obama coalition wasn't stronk enough Ya because they can't elect him again LMAO[2016-11-11. : 9:29 pm] Moose -- FaRTy1billionFaRTy1billion shouted: trump's not president yet, he's just president-elect Hey man, stop putting a damper on our head start[2016-11-11. : 7:44 pm]  MasterJohnny -- Damn it roy that was not a joke we really should abolish the electoral college[2016-11-11. : 7:36 pm] jjf28 -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: jjf28 Ok. But it sure is unfair for you to decide where I lie between ignorant and the infinite omniscient I can't use your words to guage your knowledge level and amount of prior research?[2016-11-11. : 7:25 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- "At 70 years old, Trump will be the oldest person to assume presidency." Huh, I didn't know that.[2016-11-11. : 7:13 pm] jjf28 -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: jjf28 So you're OK with racism as long as it has an expiration date. Enlightening. I didn't say I was ok with them -- just that in any case they should expire[2016-11-11. : 6:40 pm] CecilSunkure -- Answering at least one why question. Covering up a loose end aftwards[2016-11-11. : 6:40 pm] CecilSunkure -- At least those memetroll responses have some substance to them[2016-11-11. : 6:39 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- And to address poverty, we can just deport any remaining poor too  [2016-11-11. : 6:38 pm] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Nah, an easier solution would just be send every back to where they came from, then we'd only have to deal with real Americans [2016-11-11. : 6:35 pm] CecilSunkure -- If poverty is addressed, instead of race in any way, no racial-social side effects can emerge (other than association of poverty with race, which is probably unavoidable)[2016-11-11. : 6:34 pm] CecilSunkure -- Or someone violently attacks another while the policy is alive, and the damages linger long afterward[2016-11-11. : 6:34 pm] CecilSunkure -- For example, some people can feel like the racism disadvantaged them, and the effects linger. Maybe the racism pushes someone into depression and they lose a job[2016-11-11. : 6:34 pm] CecilSunkure -- The problem is once a racist policy expires the effects on the people will not magically expire[2016-11-11. : 6:33 pm] CecilSunkure -- Like the expiration date idea. Honestly I see the merit behind the motivation. M[2016-11-11. : 6:31 pm] CecilSunkure -- Don't make points if you don't want to back them up. Just meme instead, it's easier[2016-11-11. : 6:31 pm] CecilSunkure -- If you want to make these points I'd really appreciate something besides "we all think so", or "we all saw", or "I don't want to argue"[2016-11-11. : 6:30 pm] CecilSunkure -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: you still used the pejorative in the course of a tepid argument, it was still annoying jjf28jjf28 shouted: that's not really open to interpretation my friend jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure I read it all so at this point I'd rather just meme jjf28jjf28 shouted: or would rather meme, but I don't really have the data limit to meme right now jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure someone who doesn't label incredibly neutral people with pejoratives and regularly researches the topics they talk about [2016-11-11. : 6:28 pm] Vrael -- omgwtfbbqhax I am going to @ so hard in your !#@$ that you won't even $%@#@#ing know @#$@% that @@@@@ tequila[2016-11-11. : 6:27 pm] CecilSunkure -- I've already, in detail, described reasons of why using racism to combat racism will have drastic side effects. A much simpler solution is to solve poverty, which gives rise to emergent racism[2016-11-11. : 6:26 pm] CecilSunkure -- @Roy I know he's saying something like that, and I also know he read the majority of my conversation with Farty[2016-11-11. : 6:26 pm] Roy -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: jjf28 So you're OK with racism as long as it has an expiration date. Enlightening. Or maybe what he's trying to say is that it's worth repairing the damages caused by racism as opposed to leaving the discriminated to start on an unleveled playing field. It's like in a game of soccer, if one team scores 5 points because they were cheating, preventing them from cheating for the rest of the game is great, but it doesn't address the fact that they're still winning because of the points they earned by cheating.[2016-11-11. : 6:23 pm] CecilSunkure -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure someone who doesn't label incredibly neutral people with pejoratives and regularly researches the topics they talk about [2016-11-11. : 6:23 pm] CecilSunkure -- Whoops, I double quoted. Last quote was supposed to be: jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure seriously talk politics with someone who considers Farty a SJW and considers himself ignorant of politics? no thank you [2016-11-11. : 6:22 pm] CecilSunkure -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure CecilSunkure I didn't really say anything but a rehash of your quotes; I never said Farty was 'completely' neutral You said jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure someone who doesn't label incredibly neutral people with pejoratives and regularly researches the topics they talk about which is very close. And you do more than rehash: jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure seriously talk politics with someone who considers Farty a SJW and considers himself ignorant of politics? no thank you jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure seriously talk politics with someone who considers Farty a SJW and considers himself ignorant of politics? no thank you -- These are factually incorrect: I don't label Farty (besides saying he's really smart), and I do research[2016-11-11. : 6:21 pm] Roy -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: http://i.imgur.com/1eLz7Eb.jpg NudeRaider PLEASE tell me this is not fakedNudeRaider shouted: nvm it's fake. It... It says that in the description.[2016-11-11. : 6:19 pm] CecilSunkure -- That's why I'm pointing out your alignment. It's definitely oriented towards groupthink, and you respond non-constructively to things I say with factually inaccurate statements. jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure seriously talk politics with someone who considers Farty a SJW and considers himself ignorant of politics? no thank you [2016-11-11. : 6:17 pm] CecilSunkure -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: we all saw you say these things, my representation may be slightly off, but that's scarcely worth discussing CecilSunkure CecilSunkure CecilSunkure CecilSunkure CecilSunkure You're not saying why it's not worth discussing. In general you're not giving why's or reasons, and just appeal to majority opinion. "We all say this", "we all feel this way". Those aren't valid arguments[2016-11-11. : 6:16 pm] CecilSunkure -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure I don't have an alignment on affirmative action, I realize that they're unfair and inefficient and the people they are designed to help were disadvantaged most of their life; they can help to increase positive contact (that is, contact within the same socio-economic groups) and build better race-relations; really the only hard position I have is that any such reverse-discrimination measures should have built in expiration dates So you're OK with racism as long as it has an expiration date. Enlightening.[2016-11-11. : 6:15 pm] CecilSunkure -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure CecilSunkure it's not hypocrtical to simultaniously want someone to be well versed on the subject matter and to acknowledge that knowledge is bottomless Ok. But it sure is unfair for you to decide where I lie between ignorant and the infinite omniscient |
Members Online: DarkenedFantasies
DarkenedFantasies