Also, is it possible to create more than 1 mineral field at a location? I tried "create 3 mineral fields at location" for player1 or neutral, but only 1 shows up.
None.
I tried "creating mineral fields at a location" for player neutral or neutral player, but they don't show up? They do for other players though.
Also, is it possible to create more than 1 mineral field at a location? I tried "create 3 mineral fields at location" for player1 or neutral, but only 1 shows up.
Also, is it possible to create more than 1 mineral field at a location? I tried "create 3 mineral fields at location" for player1 or neutral, but only 1 shows up.
Hello
To your second question
I'm pretty sure that mineral fields handels like buildings, they can't be mass created at 1 location.
You can create a chunk for player 1 and give it to neutrals (?)
I'm pretty sure that mineral fields handels like buildings, they can't be mass created at 1 location.
You can create a chunk for player 1 and give it to neutrals (?)
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes
I thought if resources were created for a player, it would automatically be given to the neutral player. Needs a test.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Not automatically. But it's np to add a give action after the creation action.
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
Quote from 
Heinermann
HeinermannI thought if resources were created for a player, it would automatically be given to the neutral player. Needs a test.
For multiple ressource fields, you need to move the location around or use multiple locations.
It's the same with buildings. You can create them only in the middle of a location.
You cannot create units for player 12.
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[06:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[06:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[08:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier[2026-7-15. : 2:19 am]
Symmetry -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Symmetry I can't tell if it's relevant. You provided literally no context so I was providing an equally generic answer.
Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
Members Online: NudeRaider
NudeRaider