Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: [SOLVED] Detecting orders with EUDs
[SOLVED] Detecting orders with EUDs
May 10 2011, 7:52 am
By: samsizzle  

May 10 2011, 7:52 am samsizzle Post #1



I'm trying to detect the orders of the 7th (not including zero) unit placed on the map. This is what I've got for the move order:

CONDITIONS:
Memory(161340 is at least 67072)
Memory(161340 is at most 67077)
ACTIONS:
Set Death(Current Player: set to 1 for _input)
Preserve Trigger

and it doesn't work. Why is SC trolling me?

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on May 12 2011, 9:51 pm by samsizzle.



None.

May 10 2011, 12:47 pm rockz Post #2

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

bPlayerID
bMainOrderID
bMainOrderState
bOrderSignal
You're reading these 4 at the same time. I think that you want to read the order signal, which is the 4th byte, so you need to read from 2^24 to 2^32-1. Check artmoney to see which number changes (and if you would tell me which address you're trying to detect).



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

May 10 2011, 8:52 pm samsizzle Post #3



Okay. The thing is units 1-6 work fine following the exact same pattern, 7 and 8 do not. Here:
UNIT 1: WORKS
Memory(19044 is at least 67072)
Memory(19044 is at most 67077)

UNIT 2: WORKS
Memory(161760 is at least 67072)
Memory(161760 is at most 67077)

UNIT 3: WORKS
Memory(161676 is at least 67072)
Memory(161676 is at most 67077)

UNIT 4: WORKS
Memory(161592 is at least 67072)
Memory(161592 is at most 67077)

UNIT 5: WORKS
Memory(161508 is at least 67072)
Memory(161508 is at most 67077)

UNIT 6: WORKS
Memory(161424 is at least 67072)
Memory(161424 is at most 67077)

UNIT 7: DOESN'T WORK
Memory(161340 is at least 67072)
Memory(161340 is at most 67077)

UNIT 8: DOESN'T WORK
Memory(161256 is at least 67072)
Memory(161256 is at most 67077)

Why the hell does it not work... 7 and 8 are following the same freakin pattern, I've checked multiple times to make sure their IDs on the map are correct.



None.

May 12 2011, 4:14 am rockz Post #4

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

you've checked in artmoney or in scmdraft?



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

May 12 2011, 4:56 am samsizzle Post #5



scmdraft. I deleted all the units and placed them again too, to make sure the units were in the right order.

EDIT:

Had someone help me out with this and it turns out all I had to do was extend the "At Most" value by 2... works fine, problem solved.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on May 12 2011, 9:51 pm by samsizzle.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Wing Zero, Zoan