(Risk) Bound
Jul 26 2008, 2:09 am
By: zB-C-yamico96  

Jul 26 2008, 2:09 am zB-C-yamico96 Post #1



Heres another idea.
Putting the popular game Risk and Bounding together to make a fun game.
But for my idea of risk I was thinking something like splitting the races of Sc instead of everyone having the same units.
Like

North + South America = Terran
Africa + Australia = Zerg
Europe + Asia = Protoss

And having the defense go with the race like.

North + South America = Bunker + 2 Rines [6 Damage] <-- Shortest Range
Africa + Australia = Sunken [5 Damage]
Europe + Asia = Photon Cannon [5 Damage]

And like have a chain Terran > Zerg > Protoss > Terran
Something like that.
And for the bounding part, you would bound to gain your minerals. And there will be a timer.
To make the bounding a little bit spicier, when the timer goes down to 0, then the obstacle changes.
Also, you can set your own intervals ( Set Timer ) inbetween each obstacle.



None.

Jul 30 2008, 1:50 pm The_z0r Post #2



I kind of like the original RISK better than that. Cards FTW!!!



None.

Jul 31 2008, 6:11 am BlackWolf99 Post #3



name it bound risk and to get a unit or move you would have to bound an ob



None.

Jul 31 2008, 11:13 am Ultraviolet Post #4

We do a little trolling

Quote from BlackWolf99
name it bound risk and to get a unit or move you would have to bound an ob

He already said this..



My Projects:

Impossible Ultraviolet | Impossible UV 2 | Impossible UV 3
Mercenaries 2020 | Mercenaries III
Squad Defense

Legacy Projects (No guarantee of functionality in modern SC):

Pixel Adventure 2 | Space Snipers | Control the Ball

______________________________________________

Join me in Torn City

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: JamaL, Rawflesh0615, lil-Inferno, RIVE, l)ark_ssj9kevin