Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: RESOLVED: Center View Moves the Screen
RESOLVED: Center View Moves the Screen
Sep 12 2007, 10:09 pm
By: ToFu  

Sep 12 2007, 10:09 pm ToFu Post #1



i want the screen to follow with a certain unit
but i forgot how to do the trigger for it :><:



None.

Sep 12 2007, 10:13 pm Hugel Post #2



Center View

is the trigger you are looking for, but the downfall to using it is that your mouse pointer will be always centered in the exact center of the screen.



None.

Sep 12 2007, 10:38 pm Falkoner Post #3



Only if you are in 1-player mode.



None.

Sep 12 2007, 10:53 pm who Post #4



Make a location constantly center on the unit, and have a trigger that continues centering on that location. You should use hypertriggers, but if you don't put a wait before the centering, then the jagged movement of the screen is very annoying.



None.

Sep 12 2007, 10:57 pm Falkoner Post #5



I find it more annoying to have a wait there, since it has to move farther each time.



None.

Sep 13 2007, 2:55 am DT_Battlekruser Post #6



Quote from Falkoner
Only if you are in 1-player mode.

Note the other difference that in Single Player, CENTER VIEW pans the screen relatively slowly to the selected location, whereas in multiplayer, the screen snaps to the location instantly.

This can affect certain visual effects where you are trying to mask a change of map position (panning across the map can ruin effects).




None.

Sep 13 2007, 2:57 am Falkoner Post #7



You forgot that it also acts as a wait while it is panning, and since it takes so long it's a great way to detect one-player mode or not.



None.

Sep 14 2007, 10:49 pm Maith Post #8



if you constantly center view you cant move the mouse though.
i was messing around on a map and figured that out...



None.

Sep 16 2007, 1:52 am who Post #9



Quote from Maith
if you constantly center view you cant move the mouse though.
i was messing around on a map and figured that out...

That's only in 1-player mode.

Edit: whoops, someone already said that.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 19 2007, 2:31 am by someone09.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Heinermann, MobMob