Exact Unit Size
Jun 29 2008, 2:05 am
By: jandii  

Jun 29 2008, 2:05 am jandii Post #1



I'm using some inverted locations, and I'm manually testing how small they need to be so that if the unit moves 1px, then is not detected (and snapped back).

So a corsair is minimum 48px wide by 33px high, and a ghost is 14px wide by 21px high etc.

Is there research on this already, or a program which tells you how big the units are? It would just save me tons of trial and error.



None.

Jun 29 2008, 2:22 am Brontobyte Post #2



I'm pretty sure that you can go into Scmdraft 2 -> Debug -> Enable Debug. Then: Debug -> Show Unit Collision Size. This is the actual size of the units. You will just have to make a fake location over top of the units to find out there exact size in pixels.



None.

Jun 29 2008, 2:25 am Impeached Post #3



You could also go into DatEdit and find the unit's exact size.



None.

Jun 29 2008, 3:18 pm Pyro682 Post #4



If you want only the sizes for just a small amount of units, open up SCMDraft 2, and then click the unit you want to check out the size and drag mouse out to middle of screen. Count the pixels in the box. The red/green lines are included in the unit's size. If youre looking for sizes of a ton of units, then i suggest not doing this, because counting pixels is slow, but if its for like 4 or 5 units, go for it. :D



None.

Jun 29 2008, 8:14 pm O)FaRTy1billion[MM] Post #5

👻 👾 👽 💪

...Or you could open DatEdit and look at the unit's exact size given to you as a number. No counting pixels necessary.



TinyMap2 - Latest in map compression! ( 7/09/14 - New build! )
EUD Action Enabler - Lightweight EUD/EPD support! (ChaosLauncher/MPQDraft support!)
EUDDB - topic - Help out by adding your EUDs! Or Submit reference files in the References tab!
MapSketch - New image->map generator!
EUDTrig - topic - Quickly and easily convert offsets to EUDs! (extended players supported)
SC2 Map Texture Mask Importer/Exporter - Edit texture placement in an image editor!
\:farty\: This page has been viewed [img]http://farty1billion.dyndns.org/Clicky.php?img.gif[/img] times!

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Dem0n, RIVE