Why start with negative minerals? (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Why start with negative minerals?

Why start with negative minerals?

Apr 26 2008, 1:07 am
By: xAlkalix

Pages: 1

Apr 26 2008, 1:07 am xAlkalix Post #1

There is prob a reason...
But I started with negative minerals(everyone may, IDK)...

It seems kind of pointless...

I just really wish to purchase the ability to have a signature... but I don't really have any minerals yet.

None.

Apr 26 2008, 1:15 am The_z0r Post #2

Turn your minerals off?

None.

Apr 26 2008, 1:25 am

Symmetry Post #3

Dungeon Master

IIRC it was to discourage creating multiple accounts.

Apr 26 2008, 5:12 am

mikelat Post #4

Its because you are already in debt to IP for him making such a cool site. You are required to pay it off.

None.

Apr 26 2008, 5:20 am modmaster50 Post #5

Quote from name:Yoshi

Its because you are already in debt to IP for him making such a cool site. You are required to pay it off.

Exactly. You have to pay off your debt to IP by being active on site and such to earn yourself minerals. Or you can disable fun (then you cant earn minerals or give minerals, etc.). And, spamming to make posts longer is prohibited. Well, Alkali, have fun out there.

None.

Apr 26 2008, 5:28 am

Echo Post #6

Because in reality, we are all broke in minerals. IP is trying to teach us a life lesson.

None.

Apr 26 2008, 1:20 pm

Doodle77 Post #7

Quote from candle12345

With a P/PD stat like me, you'll be rich in no time
OMFG
I HAVE 666 SHOUTBOX POSTS
AND 667 POSTS TOTAL
[I was checking my prof for my posts per day, and WOW]

Quote

Profile Views: 110
Topics: 23
Posts: 667
Posts per day: 3.07
Shouts: 666
Karma: 100
Reputation: 0
Minerals: 70

Freaky.

Spammer ;0

None.

Apr 26 2008, 3:27 pm

Moose Post #8

Armor: 90.50%

Agreed.

You know, you could have just read the FAQ on minerals.

you didn't live, you doomscrolled

Options

Pages: 1

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[02:28 am]

Symmetry -- :wob:

[02:26 am]

Apos --

[09:16 am]

NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/

[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]

Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself

[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]

Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me

[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]

Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"

[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]

Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs

[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]

Zoan -- Heinermann

Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased

Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative

[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]

NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?

[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]

Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

Symmetry