no GOOD reason.
None.
I believe it's something to do with 'Ego' and 'God-Complexes'
no GOOD reason.
no GOOD reason.
Quote from 
Echo
EchoI'm against nudists too. But not for pretty girls, although all those wrinkles would be disgusting. So overall I am against exposure. Clothing helps us and protects us from all these things. It is nice being naked and alone though. So people should be sanctioned to be naked. I also hate those guys with no shirt on outside. Wtf is that? I don't want to see no man nipples or their hairy chest.
I'm guessing you are a super-Christian, btw.
None.
My only thought here is that clothing does protect us from all forms of injuries (both female and male).
Lifts, Doors, Paper-cuts.... (you get the idea)...
Lifts, Doors, Paper-cuts.... (you get the idea)...
None.
Lifts?
None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Members Online: Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet