Quote from
Aristocrat
AristocratWhat is the point of the thread anyways? Arguing over semantics?

| Answer | Votes | Percentage | % | Voters |
| Yes | 4 | 7% |
|
|
| No | 57 | 94% |
TiKels, Demented Shaman, LoTu)S, Symmetry, NudeRaider, Urahara, Devourer, DevliN, MrrLL, Generalpie, Fire_Kame, Riney, Wing Zero, FatalException, BeeR_KeG, ShredderIV, FoxWolf1, Corbo, stickynote, DavidJCobb, lil-Inferno, payne, O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Aristocrat, Syphon, DT_Battlekruser, MasterJohnny, Apos, A_of-s_t, JaBoK, BeDazed, Ashamed, Norm, l)ark_ssj9kevin, ToA, rayNimagi, poison_us, Ultraviolet, Roy, Lanthanide, BiOAtK, Sacrieur, Program, Bar Refaeli, samsizzle, Sand Wraith, rockz, Daddywhoo, CecilSunkure, Phobos, Falkoner, Leeroy_Jenkins, ForTheSwarm, Doodle77, 24million, Super Duper, Madroc
|

Aristocrat
TiKels
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
Zoan