Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Calling all Hardcore BW Mappers
Calling all Hardcore BW Mappers
Jun 7 2010, 10:11 pm
By: Aristocrat
Pages: < 1 2 3
 

Jun 9 2010, 9:36 pm DavidJCobb Post #41



Hm, Sac. I really like programming. I just really don't like C. A lot. I think I get where you're coming from, though. You like having a box because it keeps you from being overwhelmed by the possibilities -- is that what you're saying? (Sorta like how Monk, from the eponymous TV show, did that thing with his hands -- he "framed" what he was looking at, to block out distractions from his peripheral vision. He put it in a box so he could comprehend it in more detail.)

I, for one, welcome our new boxless overlords.



None.

Jun 10 2010, 4:20 am Sacrieur Post #42

Still Napping

Quote from Jack
@Sac, the scripting language is similiar to C. However, you can still do everything graphically.

I sure hope I can do EVERYTHING graphically. I have not used the editor, so I have a question, can we use mathematical expressions in place of variables (aka functions), because then I absolutely must start mapping sc2.


Quote from DavidJCobb
Hm, Sac. I really like programming. I just really don't like C. A lot. I think I get where you're coming from, though. You like having a box because it keeps you from being overwhelmed by the possibilities -- is that what you're saying? (Sorta like how Monk, from the eponymous TV show, did that thing with his hands -- he "framed" what he was looking at, to block out distractions from his peripheral vision. He put it in a box so he could comprehend it in more detail.)

I, for one, welcome our new boxless overlords.

It's not so much that I can't work in a boxless space. It's just that I work best with limitations. It gives me markers that I enjoy tremendously to think around. But then again, I'm an intuitive thinker, so it is very hard for me to explain exactly what I mean by thinking. I love coming up with creative solutions. How does that sound?

I actually have an idea in my head for a very complex and in depth sc2 map. Though as I said before. Keep it simple and it will be the most fun.



None.

Jun 10 2010, 6:30 am poison_us Post #43

Master has given Dobby a doctorate! Dobby is free!

I dedicate this song to SCI mapping.




Jun 10 2010, 7:48 am NudeRaider Post #44

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Quote from Sacrieur
I have not used the editor, so I have a question, can we use mathematical expressions in place of variables (aka functions), because then I absolutely must start mapping sc2.
Then all I have to say to you is gogo, start SC2 mapping. ;)

(What fail attempt at an incredibly powerful editor would GE be without that capability?!)




Jun 10 2010, 3:14 pm Sacrieur Post #45

Still Napping

Quote from NudeRaider
Quote from Sacrieur
I have not used the editor, so I have a question, can we use mathematical expressions in place of variables (aka functions), because then I absolutely must start mapping sc2.
Then all I have to say to you is gogo, start SC2 mapping. ;)

(What fail attempt at an incredibly powerful editor would GE be without that capability?!)

Okay, now I don't care if it lags like a bitch, I must get this game.



None.

Jun 13 2010, 1:25 am Aristocrat Post #46



Quote from Sacrieur
Quote from NudeRaider
Quote from Sacrieur
I have not used the editor, so I have a question, can we use mathematical expressions in place of variables (aka functions), because then I absolutely must start mapping sc2.
Then all I have to say to you is gogo, start SC2 mapping. ;)

(What fail attempt at an incredibly powerful editor would GE be without that capability?!)

Okay, now I don't care if it lags like a bitch, I must get this game.

The UI is still terribly unfriendly though; be prepared to make a huge jump.



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 2 3
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
[03:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- (and yes, I capitalized that correctly :ego:)
[03:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Hi not I'm dad
Hi dad, I'm nude
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Rawflesh0615, Ultraviolet