Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: Ashworld Location Height
Ashworld Location Height
Mar 5 2010, 4:38 pm
By: LoveLess  

Mar 5 2010, 4:38 pm LoveLess Post #1

Let me show you how to hump without making love.

Did anyone else know that Low and Medium are considered the same thing in Ashworld? High is only relevant to the raised ground... I was pretty angry with this discovery, I had some fun ideas to play with.

Does anyone know why it might be like this and if there is something I am missing?




None.

Mar 5 2010, 6:36 pm Lethoth Post #2



I knew it already, weird isn't it?



None.

Mar 5 2010, 7:05 pm rockz Post #3

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

there is no low ground in ash world. Magma is the only thing I would guess would be low ground, but it wouldn't matter much anyway, since only air units can be on magma.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Mar 5 2010, 8:19 pm payne Post #4

:payne:

It's the same thing with the 'Raised Jungle' in the Jungle tileset ;o



None.

Mar 5 2010, 9:16 pm Aristocrat Post #5



Quote from payne
It's the same thing with the 'Raised Jungle' in the Jungle tileset ;o

With the raised jungle however, since you also have "high raised jungle", you can artificially create a "true raised jungle" with the right vision and hit% by making raised jungle and replacing its tiles with high ground.

I implemented it in this map:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=111870

The true pinnacle of terrain height problems is the Badlands tileset. There are only ever two height levels. I was quite annoyed.



None.

Mar 5 2010, 11:22 pm Kenoli Post #6



This is accurate.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: anoeth47