Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Yo mommaship is so fat
Yo mommaship is so fat
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 2 2010, 6:59 am
By: LoTu)S  

Mar 2 2010, 6:59 am LoTu)S Post #1



Dunno if any1 reads the Battle.net forums, but this thread is probably the most epic one about sc2:

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=23425374601&sid=5000&pageNo=1

Few of the best:

Yo Mommaship so fat I didn't need Force Fields to block your Zealots.

Yo Mommaship's so fat she cloaks your main AND your expansion.

Yo Mommaship so fat she takes an extra 40 seconds to warp in.


Fav: Yo Mommaship so fat she thought feedback was takeout.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Mar 2 2010, 7:19 am by LoTu)S.



None.

Mar 2 2010, 9:48 am NudeRaider Post #2

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Here's one that I read somewhere else: (not sc2)

Yo Mommaship (mom actually) so fat she takes 2 Arbiters to be recalled.




Mar 2 2010, 11:48 am OlimarandLouie Post #3



My favorites from the battle.net topic:
Yo mommaship so ugly they had to add a confirmation box to Mass Recall.
Yo mommaship so fat her food cost has increased from 6 to 8.



None.

Mar 2 2010, 12:54 pm The Starport Post #4







None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy