SC2 BETA!
Feb 17 2010, 9:49 pm
By: MasterJohnny
Pages: < 1 « 5 6 7
 

Feb 23 2010, 9:49 pm Lt.Church Post #121



Quote from Ashamed
lol....

" This is how Blizzard balances apparently"

that shows they linked text commands to ingame actions; hopefully to the extent of something we can use in UMS later on, like EUDs but easier and not patched :lol:



None.

Feb 23 2010, 10:01 pm Heinermann Post #122

memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes

Some very interesting information:
Buildings that are landed are different units than buildings that are lifted.
The same applies to units that are burrowed and possibly other unit states.




Feb 23 2010, 10:57 pm CecilSunkure Post #123



Quote from Heinermann
Some very interesting information:
Buildings that are landed are different units than buildings that are lifted.
The same applies to units that are burrowed and possibly other unit states.
Ah, probably so that coding things is easier, that way you wouldn't have to go through the trouble of detecting//messing around with unit properties nearly as much.



None.

Feb 23 2010, 11:21 pm Ashamed Post #124

Hear me Raor!!

Quote from Lt.Church
Quote from Ashamed
lol....

" This is how Blizzard balances apparently"

that shows they linked text commands to ingame actions; hopefully to the extent of something we can use in UMS later on, like EUDs but easier and not patched :lol:
there is no way that we wont be able to.



None.

Feb 23 2010, 11:39 pm poison_us Post #125

Master has given Dobby a doctorate! Dobby is free!

Quote from Ashamed
Quote from Lt.Church
Quote from Ashamed
lol....

" This is how Blizzard balances apparently"

that shows they linked text commands to ingame actions; hopefully to the extent of something we can use in UMS later on, like EUDs but easier and not patched :lol:
there is no way that we wont be able to.
[notifyBlizzard] Ha! now you wont be able to. :P





Options
Pages: < 1 « 5 6 7
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
[03:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- (and yes, I capitalized that correctly :ego:)
[03:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Hi not I'm dad
Hi dad, I'm nude
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zoan, Heinermann