White Energy or White Power has a technology that represents a first step in building a cleaner coal solution. White Energy's coal upgrading process removes coal moisture and improves heat content and quality while essentially retaining the low emission profile of the feedstock coal.
What do you think about this? I think this is bullshit and we should switch to nuclear energy.
http://www.whiteenergyco.com/http://www.whiteenergyco.com/our-coal-technology/the-white-coal-technology-process/index.php
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Feb 18 2010, 7:09 am by Echo.
None.
White Energy or White Power has a technology that represents a first step in building a cleaner coal solution. White Energy's coal upgrading process removes coal moisture and improves heat content and quality while essentially retaining the low emission profile of the feedstock coal.
What do you think about this? I think this is bullshit and we should switch to nuclear energy.
I am against both coal and nuclear energy. Both of which does environment damage due to mining. Where is the link to this "white power"? I want to know more about it.
I am a Mathematician Computer Scientist Logic user Person who does not need to use AI
I totally thought this was a topic about white supremacy at first.
Coal isn't and will never be clean energy.
I don't know why they keep trying. Ditch coal, line the Sahara in solar panels.
None.
Relatively ancient and inactive
Solar panels aren't a very realistic solution. They take too many resources to produce for the paltry energy they produce. Nuclear ftw.
Also, as should be obvious, Echo made this topic entirely to make everything think it was going to be about white supremacy and then to surprise them.
None.
No such thing as clean coal.
No such thing as clean oil.
No such thing as clean nuclear radiation.
Wind, water, geothermal, and sun rays are the only things that will ever be 100% "clean".
None.
No such thing as clean nuclear radiation.
You're silly. Read up on
Breeder Reactors.
Solar energy simply isn't feasible in how much space they require, not to mention the cost of producing them barely stays behind the energy they generate.
Water plants and geothermal plants are all fine and dandy, but you're never going to make enough of them to keep up with our energy needs, and they simply cost more to make than Nuclear plants.
None.
No such thing as clean coal.
No such thing as clean oil.
No such thing as clean nuclear radiation.
Wind, water, geothermal, and sun rays are the only things that will ever be 100% "clean".
No offence but its not very convincing when you end up putting clean in scare qoutes o.0
I'm all for nuclear power, if all the electricity you used in your lifetime was nuclear, the waste would fit in a coke can
and as falkoner points out, that waste need not go to waste, so to speak.
I don't have anything against solar or geothermal, but nuclear power is at least equally clean as them, and currently much more feasible.
I can understand.. people see the word nuclear and jump to dire conclusions, I wish people could see past connotations and accept facts.
*eats a cookie solemnly*
None.
Magic box god; Suck it Corbo
I totally thought this was a topic about white supremacy at first.
Lol you weren't the only one
