let's see...supporting ChaosLauncher plugins. might happen.
redirecting functions...maybe leave that up to plugin writers.
and finally...
http://modcrafters.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2434#p2434
None.
yay thread resurrection.
let's see...supporting ChaosLauncher plugins. might happen.
redirecting functions...maybe leave that up to plugin writers.
and finally...
http://modcrafters.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2434#p2434
let's see...supporting ChaosLauncher plugins. might happen.
redirecting functions...maybe leave that up to plugin writers.
and finally...
http://modcrafters.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2434#p2434
I can't get the 1.16.1 EXE Edits to work. I put the file in the FG's data MPQ after deleting the old one. Nothing happened.
None.
If you are trying to add a new file, I think you also need to add the file name to a certain file, which I don't remember the name of.
None.
PyMS and ProTRG developer
You cant add it to an already made exe.
[img=http://www.modcrafters.com/images/sig_logo.png]
We mod Starcraft.
PyMS (Local/Forums) | FNTGen | ProTRG (Local) | LocUnlock | BWAI Launcher
BroodWarAI.com (Forums) | StarCraft: Team Fortress (Forums/Local)
We mod Starcraft.
PyMS (Local/Forums) | FNTGen | ProTRG (Local) | LocUnlock | BWAI Launcher
BroodWarAI.com (Forums) | StarCraft: Team Fortress (Forums/Local)
I'm fairly sure that you can. It just needs to be added to the mpq archive in the exe and the name needs to be added to Firegraft\datalist.txt
As for data.mpq, same thing there. Add it to the mpq archive and add the name to Firegraft\datalist.txt
As for data.mpq, same thing there. Add it to the mpq archive and add the name to Firegraft\datalist.txt
None.
Lol, when I can't say if SF is right for sure, it's proof I haven't worked on FG for too long.
She's right in everything I believe. I should select an available data file for the version you try running on. However, make sure it's the only one for that version. If you have more than 1, it'll choose the first one in the datalist.txt file.
If the edits aren't working...there might be a tricky bit of code in there to stop edits on different versions. It was either planned or implemented at some point, I seriously do not remember. I don't think it is though. I think it was never finished, only planned.
She's right in everything I believe. I should select an available data file for the version you try running on. However, make sure it's the only one for that version. If you have more than 1, it'll choose the first one in the datalist.txt file.
If the edits aren't working...there might be a tricky bit of code in there to stop edits on different versions. It was either planned or implemented at some point, I seriously do not remember. I don't think it is though. I think it was never finished, only planned.
None.
PyMS and ProTRG developer
From what I understand (bajadulce and others at BWAI did these exe edits and found this out) it's not that the exe edits don't work, its that when you add new exe edits to the .fgd in an already created FG exe they don't appear in the list of EXE edits. You have to add the changes to the FG data mpq and then create a new EXE for them to appear.
[img=http://www.modcrafters.com/images/sig_logo.png]
We mod Starcraft.
PyMS (Local/Forums) | FNTGen | ProTRG (Local) | LocUnlock | BWAI Launcher
BroodWarAI.com (Forums) | StarCraft: Team Fortress (Forums/Local)
We mod Starcraft.
PyMS (Local/Forums) | FNTGen | ProTRG (Local) | LocUnlock | BWAI Launcher
BroodWarAI.com (Forums) | StarCraft: Team Fortress (Forums/Local)
Yeah, and uh, that makes sense because the data files in the exe's are only there to be read when patching currently. Another one of those 'planned to be changed but wasn't yet' things.
None.
Quote
You have to add the changes to the FG data mpq and then create a new EXE for them to appear.
That's what I did. It didn't work.
But BWAI has a version of FG with the edits I need enabled, so I'll just use that. Though some of the default values are weird like spellcaster energy defaulting to 0.
None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Members Online: Doodan
Doodan