None.
Trust me, he isn't new to this, check out his first post at Maplantis and you'll see what I mean, I think he was just testing out these transitions and thought it looked good, and while it does, it isn't what most people like
Jello-Jigglers and Falkoner are right. I didn't make this for you guys to say : OMG HE SO GOD DAMN GOOD !
I just wanted to do some clean and neat blends that look good.
I just wanted to do some clean and neat blends that look good.
None.
good for you cob. I on the other hand do terrain, because I don't like WoodenFire. and in my spite I found it challenging, and fun.
None.
I think it looks like everything except the water is on the same level. I would like to see more details and signs that there are higher parts and lower parts. Anyhow it's nice overall
None.
Maybe because everything IS on the same level ?
None.
No Cob lol! I think he was suggesting that you add more levels to the piece 
None.
Well, ok then.
None.
Options
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)
Members Online: Zoan, Heinermann
Zoan, Heinermann