Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: What is going on here?
What is going on here?
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Jun 26 2009, 10:35 pm
By: scwizard  

Jun 26 2009, 10:35 pm scwizard Post #1



The map has five triggers (not including hypers) and three locations. The locations are all invisible, so use the locations section on the left side treeview of SCMDraft to view them.

Look at the triggers and then take a note of what you expect to happen. The play the map and take a note a which does happen. Then post here explaining why what happens happens.

Attachments:
invertedlocs.scx
Hits: 8 Size: 35.02kb

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jun 26 2009, 10:42 pm by scwizard.



None.

Jun 26 2009, 10:36 pm Morphling Post #2



Where are the triggers and/or map?



None.

Jun 26 2009, 10:37 pm stickynote Post #3



I believe posting the map would help. ;)



None.

Jun 26 2009, 10:42 pm scwizard Post #4



I forgot to press the "attach this" button >_>



None.

Jun 26 2009, 10:47 pm Morphling Post #5



Nevermind. lol

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jun 26 2009, 10:57 pm by Morphling.



None.

Jun 26 2009, 10:55 pm Heinermann Post #6

memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes

Um? Is this some kind of joke? The triggers appear in the order I expect, so what's the point?




Jun 26 2009, 10:56 pm Lethal_Illusion Post #7



Order:
1) Location centered on "0x0 @ 1000x1000"
2) text "Unit X cord = 1000" doesn't display (tank is not in the location)
3) location centered on "0x0 @ 999x999"
4) text "Unit x cord = 999" displays (tank is in location)
5) text "I'm freaking out man!" displays
**next trigger loop**
6) text "Unit x cord = 1000" displays (the location is still on "0x0 @ 999x999")


If you enable Preserve Trigger on the first trigger (centering the location on x=1000), then "Unit X cord = 1000" will never display.



None.

Jun 26 2009, 10:59 pm scwizard Post #8



Quote from Heinermann
Um? Is this some kind of joke? The triggers appear in the order I expect, so what's the point?
Well apparently it doesn't appear in the order morphling expects, nor in the order I expect.

If you center the inverted location, and then check to see if the unit is at that location. Why does it say "false" finish the trigger cycle and then say "true"?



None.

Jun 26 2009, 11:01 pm JaFF Post #9



Quote from scwizard
Quote from Heinermann
Um? Is this some kind of joke? The triggers appear in the order I expect, so what's the point?
Well apparently it doesn't appear in the order morphling expects, nor in the order I expect.

If you center the inverted location, and then check to see if the unit is at that location. Why does it say "false" finish the trigger cycle and then say "true"?
Lethal explained it to you. Basically, the inverted location stays at the 999 position after the first trigger loop, hence, in the second trigger loop, the display 1000 trigger will run.



None.

Jun 26 2009, 11:03 pm scwizard Post #10



Quote from Lethal_Illusion
Order:
1) Location centered on "0x0 @ 1000x1000"
2) text "Unit X cord = 1000" doesn't display (tank is not in the location)
3) location centered on "0x0 @ 999x999"
4) text "Unit x cord = 999" displays (tank is in location)
5) text "I'm freaking out man!" displays
**next trigger loop**
6) text "Unit x cord = 1000" displays (the location is still on "0x0 @ 999x999")

If you enable Preserve Trigger on the first trigger (centering the location on x=1000), then "Unit X cord = 1000" will never display.
Oh that makes perfect sense. Whoops :(



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zoan