Staredit Network > Forums > Modding Discussion > Topic: DoA has a request. :3
DoA has a request. :3
May 2 2009, 2:36 am
By: Rainah  

May 2 2009, 2:36 am Rainah Post #1



http://scu.samods.org

DO IT.

DO IT OR HE'LL CANCEL FG. HE TOLD ME SO.

He thinks you guys don't deserve FG or something, he's all >: face. So do this to pep him up? D:



None.

May 2 2009, 3:04 am Corbo Post #2

ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO

Wasnt this hosted at bwai?



fuck you all

May 2 2009, 3:26 am Rainah Post #3



I... I don't know? D: But can you guys please work on whatever it is?



None.

May 2 2009, 4:08 am FlyingHat Post #4



Quote from Corbo
Wasnt this hosted at bwai?
It's similar, but not really close to the wiki at BWAI. The BWAI wiki got killed when baja tried to do something with the BWAI shoutbox.



None.

May 2 2009, 4:34 am bajadulce Post #5



SCU was never hosted at BWAI.com, tho we have had an older off-line static copy of it for download for about 2 years now.

BWAI wiki was designed to be different than SCU in that it was intended to be a database of highly detailed tutorials and step-by-step examples with only minor background details. SCU explains more HOW SC works. The BWAI wiki was axed due to it being a waste of energy. The shoutbox was axed because it refreshed too many times and the sloppy code was very taxing on our super mini-sized hosting plan.

SCU is a great resource and hope it continues to grow.



None.

May 2 2009, 6:07 am Sand Wraith Post #6

she/her

I just read through most of it. Fun.

It really needs a grammar Nazi though. And lots of commie-spelling-bastards. E.G. me. >>




May 2 2009, 7:32 pm FlyingHat Post #7



Quote from name:New-.Hydrolisk
I just read through most of it. Fun.

It really needs a grammar Nazi though. And lots of commie-spelling-bastards. E.G. me. >>
*cough*



None.

May 2 2009, 8:15 pm Sand Wraith Post #8

she/her

Lurz, basic proofreading will do.

Besides, those mistakes were a part of a post on a random Internet forum. :P

EYE AR GUD SPELLAR AND HAVE LOTS OF AWESUM GRAMMERZZZ




May 3 2009, 2:30 am poiuy_qwert Post #9

PyMS and ProTRG developer

DoA is very serious about this. Don't only proofread, add knowledge!




May 3 2009, 3:22 am Corbo Post #10

ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO

I know he is he has been tempted to revive it for over two years now



fuck you all

May 4 2009, 3:30 am Rainah Post #11



Quote from poiuy_qwert
DoA is very serious about this. Don't only proofread, add knowledge!
plzplzplz? D:

Just do like a little bit, even if it is just proofreading.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Shishani, NimoStar