Staredit Network > Forums > General StarCraft > Topic: Distortion of popularity
Distortion of popularity
Apr 21 2009, 12:11 pm
By: Queen-Gambit  

Apr 21 2009, 12:11 pm Queen-Gambit Post #1



During the console wars I blogged about how the Wii will be the most popular. In my blogs, i told ppl that Wii would out sell ne console because it targets casual gamers. People are distorted by what was going to be the most popular. ONLY gamers would argue about either ps3 or 360 online. Seeing only those kinds of ppl talking about it, nobody realized that the ones NOT discussing it online aka casual gamers/kids outnumbers the 360/ps3 fans. I got a lot of negative feedbacks. One of the famous one I thought was funny was , "you suck, your a b#$%^, Wii is gay, 360 ftw." Kind of embarrasing to read lol. It was inevitable, Wii out selling both ps3 and 360. That brought my self-esteem way up. Ppl still shock =/

Tieing this to General starcraft: This can be argued for starcraft2. Will New players out weigh the old ones? It may seem popular but i've seen some gaming polls saying they wouldn't get sc2. The ppl that would say yes are undoubtably sc fans. Will sc2 hype attract new players? Your thoughts



None.

Apr 21 2009, 12:34 pm TriggR_HappE Post #2



Of course there's going to be new players, but I would say they majority of its players are going to be those who move up from SC1. I figure most of the first time players are going to be Blizzard fans that switch from one of the other games like diablo and WC.



None.

Apr 21 2009, 4:44 pm Decency Post #3



The Wii abandoned competitive gaming and focused on attracting non-gamers. Their goal worked to an extent, but the only game I'm aware of that has even a tiny competitive following on the Wii is SSBB.

Hopefully SC2 won't go that route, it would be a damned shame to see them sell out competitive gaming. From everything I've read, though, it doesn't seem like that will be the case, and that the opposite will be true. They aren't going as far as removing MBS, but they are forcing players to have a healthy APM.



None.

Apr 21 2009, 7:24 pm -BW-Map_God Post #4



I have a lot of friends who are planning to get Starcraft II even though they no longer play starcraft or never played Starcraft. I think it is well hyped as an awesome rts scenario and that there will be plently of new people as well as old. Another good question might be will it be good enough that most of us stop playing the original at all? I mean with the UMS options and 10 years of other maps we have here there are a lot of options for Starcraft-Brood War games to play.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[02:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy