Staredit Network > Forums > General StarCraft > Topic: The Usual B.netters
The Usual B.netters
Feb 23 2009, 6:10 pm
By: Ix~  

Feb 23 2009, 6:10 pm Ix~ Post #1



The Usual B.netters
*Link has page describing the many hilarious types of personalities associated with using Battle.net. Highly recommended for comical read.

P.S. Add your own personality types to this thread

Ex:
Pervert
This guy hangs out in channel Sex,Sex2,Sex3,Sex4,Sex5 depending on which one he can get into. He is always a male most of the time pretending to be a female. He will talk about perverted sex.

Mr. Caveman
This guy has either played singleplayer for years without playing on battle.net or has not played on battle.net for several years. He most likely reinstalled the game because he heard about SC2.

Mr. Noob
This guy plays 7v1 Comp Stomps, 2v6 Comp Micro Jail, and other players vs. comp type games. Normally he has about a 10% win ratio. He may not know how to ally or what the rules are.



None.

Feb 23 2009, 6:48 pm JaFF Post #2



The people who wrote and compiled that page truly have no life. They're not doing anything productive.



None.

Feb 23 2009, 6:53 pm Ix~ Post #3



IMO, whoever played that is the type to play Starcraft competitively on a regular basis. Defenitely the makers were guys who play SC more than most of us.



None.

Feb 23 2009, 10:46 pm UnholyUrine Post #4



Was boring at first.. got a bit funny and interesting, then ultimately very boring again.. it just doesn't fit with me being an UMS player :C

But I absolutely hate the Bovines (and love the way they characterize them as cows lolol)



None.

Feb 24 2009, 1:47 am Wakalord Post #5



I actually found this to be pretty funny.



None.

Feb 25 2009, 5:16 am Norm Post #6



They had enough 'funny' to fill about one paragraph, but decided to extend the webpage to several paragraphs. Needs intense re-writing for humor reasons.



None.

Feb 25 2009, 8:36 am Keirebu Post #7



I don't see why everyone is complaining, I quite enjoyed that, Thanks for sharing.



None.

Feb 25 2009, 9:13 pm ClansAreForGays Post #8



Waste of time. Written by a bunch of nerds that look down on UMS players.




Feb 26 2009, 2:57 pm Ix~ Post #9



Quote
Waste of time. Written by a bunch of nerds that look down on UMS players.
LOL! Have you never played a melee game? You will find the exact type of people in both types...... -_-



None.

Feb 26 2009, 10:51 pm Keirebu Post #10



Quote from Ix~
Quote
Waste of time. Written by a bunch of nerds that look down on UMS players.
LOL! Have you never played a melee game? You will find the exact type of people in both types...... -_-
I have to agree with lx, This is called "Average Bnetters" Meaning ALL Bnetters, not JUST "UMS".
I love that line, "Written by a Bunch of nerds that look down on UMS playersz" lol, Now THAT is funny, Since when the hell did it say this is about UMS players, This is about ALL players in general, For one, you can find those types of people, ON ALL Games...

The only flames against this are by people that obviously cannot understand it.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zycorax, Oh_Man