Quote from 
Echo
EchoI think admin should check for who voted. There is too much votes against the ratio of people are usually on.
There's no rule against voting in a poll if you're not usually active O.o
Polls
| Answer | Votes | Percentage | % | Voters |
| Nuderaider | 3 | 4% |
None.
|
|
| Barack Obama | 21 | 23% |
None.
|
|
| Killer_Kow | 3 | 4% |
None.
|
|
| Krayzee | 27 | 30% |
None.
|
|
| Dapperdan | 39 | 42% |
None.
|
Poll has 93 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).
Dungeon Master
There's no rule against voting in a poll if you're not usually active O.o
Hello
Congratulations to everyone, also to dapperdan who (at least) came so far ^.^
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Quote from name:Killer_Kow
Quote from Echo
EchoI think admin should check for who voted. There is too much votes against the ratio of people are usually on.
There's no rule against voting in a poll if you're not usually active O.o
None.
Dungeon Master
Quote from Echo
EchoQuote from name:Killer_Kow
Quote from Echo
EchoI think admin should check for who voted. There is too much votes against the ratio of people are usually on.
There's no rule against voting in a poll if you're not usually active O.o
Show me the rule against multi-accounts O.o
Looks like we have a bunch of sore losers. 
None.
Quote from name:Killer_Kow
Quote from Echo
EchoQuote from name:Killer_Kow
Quote from Echo
EchoI think admin should check for who voted. There is too much votes against the ratio of people are usually on.
There's no rule against voting in a poll if you're not usually active O.o
Show me the rule against multi-accounts O.o
None.
Dungeon Master
If everyone is granted the same opportunity to use multiple accounts, how is it not fair? Dapperdan could've created a few dozen new accounts if he felt like surviving.
Quote from Echo
EchoI think admin should check for who voted. There is too much votes against the ratio of people are usually on.
None.
Quote from Echo
EchoI think admin should check for who voted. There is too much votes against the ratio of people are usually on.
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
ip, you already deleted all minerals 
, so no point in doing anything... O.o
Or are we getting them back, including sent/received minerals?
Well in this case I'd just fine 100-300 minerals on the offender since there was no official rule against it.
Next game should have some coverage rule that says like "any measures that give you more votes than you usually have (excluding convincing friends to vote for you)". Then violation of that rule has the concequence of being disqualified. If only detected after the game, redistribution of the minerals: Split up the minerals the cheater got and give it to the other winner(s).
, so no point in doing anything... O.oOr are we getting them back, including sent/received minerals?
Well in this case I'd just fine 100-300 minerals on the offender since there was no official rule against it.
Next game should have some coverage rule that says like "any measures that give you more votes than you usually have (excluding convincing friends to vote for you)". Then violation of that rule has the concequence of being disqualified. If only detected after the game, redistribution of the minerals: Split up the minerals the cheater got and give it to the other winner(s).
I think the outcome of the poll would have been unaffected either way, since KrayZee got a ridiculous number of people to vote Dapperdan and they were all legit votes.
None.
I have no way of knowing (unless there's a G-mod feature I don't know about) of knowing which votes are legit and which are made by alts. In order to enforce such a rule, I'd have to have an admin check the votes at the end of every round. That's why there's no mention of alt voting in the rules. I was well aware that it was highly possible, but there wasn't really anything I could do about it. Sort of like the no PM's rule in older mafia games. There was no way for a non-admin to enforce it, so I didn't want to go "Here's the game's glaring flaw that I have no control over, please don't take advantage of it!"
None.
How about making the final round a PM-vote instead of a public vote? I think it would be fair if only the current game participants (including dead ones) can vote. Of course, you can't use this system for all rounds, but a special case such as the final round is worth considering.
None.
Quote from 
JaFF
JaFFHow about making the final round a PM-vote instead of a public vote? I think it would be fair if only the current game participants (including dead ones) can vote. Of course, you can't use this system for all rounds, but a special case such as the final round is worth considering.
None.
Relatively ancient and inactive
I trust Doodan.
None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Members Online: RIVE
RIVE