If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
None.
"Do you know which of these doors is in front of the treasure?"
If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Quote from 
FatalException
FatalException"Do you know which of these doors is in front of the treasure?"
If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
If you get the truth-teller, they'll tell you which door has the treasure. If you get the liar, they'll say they don't know.
Also your question implies another (where is the door). But there's only 1 question allowed, so the knight will just say yes.
Nude, you already got the question right. And fatal's your answer does not work... because asking the knight if he knows which door will not get him to tell you which door the treasure behind. He'll just say yes or no.
None.
How much wood could woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
None.
Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
None.
Quote from Dapperdan
DapperdanUsing the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
Gotta love Chuck Norris jokes xD
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
What is it?
George Bush has a short one, Arnold Schwarzenegger a long one, couples often use it together, bachelors have it for themselves, Madonna has none and the pope never uses it.
George Bush has a short one, Arnold Schwarzenegger a long one, couples often use it together, bachelors have it for themselves, Madonna has none and the pope never uses it.
Im guessing a d*ck?
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Oh c'mon, a little more imagination please.
A name!
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Madonna has a name
Lies. 
A train of thought?
Couples think together
Bush has a small thought line.
Arnold has a huge one.
Madonna has none,
And the pope never uses his. LOL
A train of thought?
Couples think together
Bush has a small thought line.
Arnold has a huge one.
Madonna has none,
And the pope never uses his. LOL
None.
A last name?
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
yes.
Your turn, swarm.
@Viet well so close
Your turn, swarm.
@Viet well so close
Quote from name:Epoch
Quote from Dapperdan
DapperdanUsing the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
Gotta love Chuck Norris jokes xD
Got it from wikianswers.
None.
Oh you suck nude. 
None.
You are in your house. The clock says 7:30 PM. Then you drive to the store. It takes 10 minutes. When you get there, your watch says 7:30 PM.
DUN DUN DUN.
DUN DUN DUN.
None.
Your watch and your clock are 10 minutes apart from each other?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
None.
Dungeon Master
Quote from FatalException
FatalExceptionYour watch and your clock are 10 minutes apart from each other?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
He said it takes 10 minutes
Quote from name:Killer_Kow
Quote from FatalException
FatalExceptionYour watch and your clock are 10 minutes apart from each other?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
The store is one-sixth of a timezone away and you cross that distance at amazing speeds because your car is secretly the Concorde?
He said it takes 10 minutes
Wait what?
None.
[06:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[06:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[06:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier[2026-7-15. : 2:19 am]
Symmetry -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Symmetry I can't tell if it's relevant. You provided literally no context so I was providing an equally generic answer.
Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
Members Online: Symmetry, 
Heinermann
Symmetry, Heinermann