Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: Alliance Status problems
Alliance Status problems
Nov 29 2008, 2:29 am
By: MetalGear  

Nov 29 2008, 2:29 am MetalGear Post #1



i am working on my new call of duty map, which involves a realistic gun/ammunition/reloading system. since there is a reloading time for each gun, i need triggers to stop the human player from attacking the computer player. i have already tried setting the alliance status so that the computer player is set to allies and preserved trigger. this works. however, the problem is, once i do this, the computer player stops attacking also, even though there is a preserved trigger that tells the computer player to set the human player to enemy.

any suggestions?



None.

Nov 29 2008, 2:39 am NudeRaider Post #2

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Well the solution is simple: Only run the alliance for the player.
You are probably running the set alliance to ally action for the comp too.




Nov 29 2008, 2:40 am Craftstar2 Post #3



This shouldn't happen. Whether the computer is an enemy or ally to you doesn't affect whether you are an enemy or ally to the comp.

Condition: (for human players only)
Curren player accumulates exactly 0 gas. (guessing ammo count)
Action:
Set computer to ally.
Preserve.

If during the whole map you want the computer to attack you, you don't need to preserve it.



None.

Nov 29 2008, 3:35 am SelfPossessed Post #4



If I had to guess, the computer was probably ordered to Attack instead of Patrol. Computer units under Attack command will move towards their destination ignoring enemies UNLESS ATTACKED FIRST. Patrol is the better option.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[02:26 am]
Apos -- :wob:
[2026-9-11. : 9:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zycorax, lifebot