I'd agree to LD if you were barred from it, because I feel you're just going to do to LD what you did to SD. Thus, if you really want LD to be there as a part of SEN, and not just for your own uses, you'll agree. If you just want it for yourself, you'll disagree.

I'm not an altruist. I want an LD to participate in. At the same time, it has a positive effect on SEN.

If you're referring to Kyrax, he's been taken care of. We've all been monitoring this thread.

I am not referring to Kyrax. I'm referring to the whole bits of moderator-bashing by myself and others, and responses to the same by the moderators in question. If the thread is shortened and the less-attractive, questionably-against-rules and questionably-off-topic discussion of the moderators is cut out from this thread, we can focus on the actual issues with the thread without having people like Ex waltz in and try to short-circuit the idea because of my motives.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 24 2010, 4:55 am by Centreri.

How about this, instead? We already have a multi-page topic on the matter in the Staff Forum. Because the discussion has become so severely derailed, I'm going to close this thread and the discussion will resume in the aforementioned topic. You've got plenty of support for the return of "Lite Discussion," as well as plenty of support for keeping it off SEN. I presume this topic was originally designed to gauge public interest toward the idea of Lite Discussion's return. Ultimately it is up to the staff to decide the outcome, and we'll be keeping in mind said gauge as we figure out what the next step is, supposing there is a next step.

If there is any further need for discussion or debate, I'm sure PMs will suffice.