Samurai vs Ninja (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Samurai vs Ninja

Samurai vs Ninja

Sep 13 2007, 2:50 am
By: Moogle

Pages: 1

Sep 13 2007, 2:50 am Moogle Post #1

Predator of Bed Chambers

Since it seems Pirate vs Ninja was a big hit why not try this one.

Samurai vs Ninja

Both were strong warriors in that era when needed. Both were trained in the arts of war and tactics.

Whom do you think would win?

So Choose you destiny!

A reason why you think that group is better then other or maybe you think both are even!

- - - - - -

Samurai

Lived by the sword and died by it. Samurais had a code of honor unlike the ninja. Samuaris death was more glorified then a ninjas death. Yet both used katanas and were both skilled in combat. Though Samuari's used armor while ninja didn't. I believe a Samuari could win on a battle-field where he could see the ninja. As well I believe that Samuari are much stronger then a ninja in strength and skills.

But this only my opinion.. So what is yours?

If all else fails, crowbar the fucker

Sep 13 2007, 3:31 am

MasterJohnny Post #2

Ninja

I am a ~~Mathematician~~ ~~Computer Scientist~~ Logic user

Sep 13 2007, 3:37 am Elric111 Post #3

ninja...the match just isn't as debatable as with the pirate thread....leather armor is too weak, two-handed sword equals far slower swing...the only i can see samurai winning is the fact that there were prob. way more samurai than ninjas (outnumbering factor)....u know what might be interesting Spartan Hoplite vs Roman Legionary (both individual and in groups)

None.

Sep 13 2007, 3:50 am

EzDay281 Post #4

Samurai!
No argument.

None.

Sep 13 2007, 3:56 am Elric111 Post #5

Quote from EzDay281

Samurai!
No argument.

samurai jack was such a good show ^_^

but then again he never carried the armor and could jump like fantasy ninjas could but was still a honorable samurai...i would have to say he is a ninjarai

...sounds liek a pretty nice ranking

None.

Options

Pages: 1

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[06:10 pm]

Ultraviolet -- sweet summer child

[2026-6-26. : 10:31 am]

NudeRaider -- blessed innocent soul knows nothing of the strife we had before EUDs were discovered :teehee:

[2026-6-23. : 3:29 am]

DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.

[2026-6-22. : 8:35 pm]

Ultraviolet -- :wob:

[2026-6-21. : 11:38 pm]

Symmetry -- :wob:

[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]

Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically

[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]

Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?

[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]

Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings

[2026-6-20. : 6:15 pm]

Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.

[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]

NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

Ultraviolet