None.
Alright, so since the old wiki was deleted with all the tutorials that were actually valuable, I was wondering if anyone had a kill score database somewhere with all the scores for different units?
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
http://www.staredit.net/starcraft/List_of_StarCraft_Units
Since the old wiki wasdeletedmade difficult to access, the new wiki has at least a FEW good pages on it. What did you search for? Searching for "unit score" didn't really bring up much, but it at least brought up that page.
IMO, that list is infinitely more useful than any list we've ever had on SEN. I'll make a weapons page once we get solidified in our wiki (we don't really have enough members to maintain a wiki), unless someone else makes it.
Since the old wiki was
IMO, that list is infinitely more useful than any list we've ever had on SEN. I'll make a weapons page once we get solidified in our wiki (we don't really have enough members to maintain a wiki), unless someone else makes it.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
Thanks guys. I searched for "Kill Score" and nothing interesting came up by the way.
None.
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:49 am]
Ultraviolet -- "Not many people know this, but I actually got the idea for my mustache after seeing the end of a paintbrush for the first time." 
[2026-3-08. : 12:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- "often was always pretty cool" 60% of the time, it works every time 
[2026-3-07. : 11:26 pm]
NudeRaider -- The visuals are good, the animation is terrible: the movement is off, the impacts in battle scenes have zero weight to it, the lip sync is right up uncanny valley. But yeah, considering what it is it's pretty good overall.[2026-3-07. : 9:51 am]
NimoStar -- And Pathfinding in SC1 was not *that* bad, the problem is that it was designed as a flat 2D game like WC1 (and it was in the alpha) and then switched to isometric without changing the base code. So its actually a flat game pretending to be isometric. With the custom competitive maps that use larger ramps and elevation, pathfinding is quite fixed.[2026-3-07. : 9:47 am]
NimoStar -- The unlocking and map choice was fine, but mostly in WoL - In HoTS the worst of all units are irrelevant because Kerrigan has infinite summon and stuff. And even in WoL the spaceship instakill map powers are better than units. If I could RTS in my RTS that'd be great.[2026-3-05. : 8:45 pm]
NudeRaider -- NekronNekron shouted: NudeRaider not that the og sc1 campaigns are particularly good mechanically but cmon, SC2 map mechanics are the opposite of fun
There's many parts to it. I think the raw rts gameplay of sc1 is unsurpassed to this day. And I too never liked that sc2 missions always rush you in some way or another, because I like to take my time. However I still have to admit that they way they did it often was always pretty cool. Like lava rising and receding, a huge-ass mothership destroying bases, undead coming at night, just to name a few, those are definitely creative, so I'm sure there's people that liked it. But that's not even what I meant. It's the unlocking of new features and upgrades and choice which map to play next that made it so much more motivating for me.[2026-3-05. : 6:49 pm]
Nekron -- like the train maps, enemies just kind of come at you (I'm not sure if there is a real enemy base, there might be one just on a technicality - you are to never interact with its production) and then you gotta chase trains for lulz
Members Online: Excalibur
Excalibur