|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2017-3-27. : 7:49 pm] tehkain -- Is it possible to have fixed starting locations with a non-use-map-settings map?[2017-3-27. : 7:48 pm]  Alzarath -- 1.18 is being applied to the classic game. The remaster is probably going to use that version, barring any further updates. As far as I can tell, it's just the graphical overhaul that's restricted to the Remaster. However, there could be more to it than that.[2017-3-27. : 7:45 pm]  NudeRaider -- AlzarathAlzarath shouted: You don't consider the keybinds or window support upgrades? Actually I take the last few shouts back. I'm not sure anymore which news regard both versions and which is sc:r exclusive.[2017-3-27. : 7:36 pm] Alzarath -- I really doubt they'd restrict the viewport. 4:3 is simply an arbitrary aspect ratio that was used because of the time it was made. 16:9 is the de-facto standard these days and wouldn't likely give anyone any sort of advantage.[2017-3-27. : 7:35 pm] ejac1337 -- https://us.battle.net/forums/en/starcraft/topic/20753705604#post-4[2017-3-27. : 7:33 pm] NudeRaider -- This is purely speculation, but I think they will restrict the viewport in some way for competitive games.[2017-3-27. : 7:32 pm] NudeRaider -- I'm just poking fun at you, but what I wanna say is, since there has been 0 mention of any upgrade to classic bw, I doubt there will be any changes whatsover.[2017-3-27. : 7:31 pm] NudeRaider -- they are not updating the original game, hence the label 'original'[2017-3-27. : 7:31 pm] Alzarath -- Golly, I really should have clarified I was speaking in future tense. Oh wait.  [2017-3-27. : 7:30 pm] NudeRaider -- AlzarathAlzarath shouted: There been any news if the original game will support 16:9? I'm pretty sure if the original game supported 16:9 we would've noticed by now.  [2017-3-27. : 7:28 pm] Alzarath -- Wasn't announced there. It'd be a bit of a shame if it doesn't, seeing how people are definitely going to get upset over players of the original are going to be disadvantaged compared to players of the remaster. Surely they must be implementing it as a feature in 1.18 if they intend on adding it to the remaster, even if it means not being enabled.[2017-3-27. : 7:06 pm] NudeRaider -- it is my understanding that this will be introduced with the release of the 1.18 patch[2017-3-27. : 7:05 pm] NudeRaider -- AposApos shouted: Wait, new old starcraft isn't free? it will be. Like sc2 starter edition.[2017-3-27. : 6:51 pm] NudeRaider -- >Time to rollout pixelated 8bit fonts and people will actually believe it[2017-3-27. : 6:30 pm] rockz -- I rather like night of the dead, the mindless SFE games are pretty fun, and tower defenses are cool[2017-3-27. : 6:25 pm] Broflamingo -- Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: Pretty sure I'm triggered How is calling people Mexicans and retards, ranting about how pro you are, and still losing in DS going?[2017-3-27. : 6:17 pm] Broflamingo -- Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: Pretty sure I'm triggered Glad you agree[2017-3-27. : 5:20 pm] Vrael -- yeah what the hell why is the site faster who fucked up and fixed something[2017-3-27. : 5:14 pm] Zoan -- Ya why is the site running faster. Did somebody finally give shellcode access to the code or whatever?[2017-3-27. : 5:10 pm] zsnakezz -- yeeeeah, that's vaguely what ive been getting at, git em outa heyaa[2017-3-27. : 5:10 pm] Dem0n -- or just rid of them because literally no one ever is going to use them with SC:R coming out[2017-3-27. : 5:08 pm] Alzarath -- Don't know if I'd call the StarCraft 2 forums here *unused*, but at this point it'd probably be better to recommend people toward other sites more dedicated to it.[2017-3-27. : 5:08 pm] Alzarath -- Their dedicated forums are pretty bad for finding support for the editor last I checked, though.[2017-3-27. : 5:06 pm] zsnakezz -- unlike sc1, sc2 has a very active dedicated forum on blizzards site.[2017-3-27. : 5:02 pm] zsnakezz -- in example, nobody on this site is posting sc2 content to this site[2017-3-27. : 5:02 pm] zsnakezz -- i think the load times have improved pretty well, but i still think there is a lot of unused portions of the site that are carrying some extra weight[2017-3-27. : 4:58 pm] Dem0n -- You need to talk to Moose about fixing this garbage heap of a site LMAO[2017-3-27. : 4:49 pm] Alzarath -- Yeah, that's a small concern I had. I doubt they would, though. I'm curious if they updated otherwise unused assets.[2017-3-27. : 4:32 pm] Zoan -- OH hey, what if the removed unused units? That would totally break a lot of the deathcounters used in past maps D:[2017-3-27. : 4:03 pm] NudeRaider -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Corbo yup. New search isn't specific enough. although anyone not ragequitting after the first try would notice.  [2017-3-27. : 3:59 pm] NudeRaider -- CorboCorbo shouted: And why is such advanced menu hidden anyway? It should right out display in the first result page as a "refine search" or "apply filters" kind of thing yup. New search isn't specific enough.[2017-3-27. : 3:58 pm] NudeRaider -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: And frankly, it's not SENs fault if people are lazy and use quick search without realizing there's a proper search. Especially you Corbo, being on this site from the beginning, should have at some point noticed that there's a menu. Maybe we should just remove quick search. then people will go "boo, NO search at all. Shit site" without thinking to browse the functions... or realizing you can get from quick to proper search by click of a button.[2017-3-27. : 3:57 pm] NudeRaider -- And frankly, it's not SENs fault if people are lazy and use quick search without realizing there's a proper search. Especially you Corbo, being on this site from the beginning, should have at some point noticed that there's a menu. Maybe we should just remove quick search. then people will go "boo, NO search at all. Shit site" without thinking to browse the functions...[2017-3-27. : 3:56 pm] NudeRaider -- CorboCorbo shouted: I admit I had never before seen the "advanced" options but even the advanced options lack, if you have used any other actual real forum software you will realise this. not sure what specific function you're missing, but yeah it's not super duper uber search, but as I've always said, it gets the job done.[2017-3-27. : 3:53 pm] NudeRaider -- CorboCorbo shouted: And a search telling me to use "better keywords" because it cannot do its job is no search at all. you can specify a date rangee[2017-3-27. : 3:52 pm] Corbo -- And why is such advanced menu hidden anyway? It should right out display in the first result page as a "refine search" or "apply filters" kind of thing[2017-3-27. : 3:51 pm] Corbo -- I admit I had never before seen the "advanced" options but even the advanced options lack, if you have used any other actual real forum software you will realise this.[2017-3-27. : 3:50 pm] Corbo -- I do not expect them to guess what I want either this is simple stuff.[2017-3-27. : 3:49 pm] Corbo -- And a search telling me to use "better keywords" because it cannot do its job is no search at all.[2017-3-27. : 3:48 pm] Corbo -- If you search "corbo", for example, given that only the earliest instances are showj you will end up with 200 results of corbo from 2007 and stop probably at 2007 too.[2017-3-27. : 3:47 pm] Corbo -- " Please note that -no matter your permissions- deleted posts/topics will be ignored. Hidden forums will be ignored, even if you are able to view them. Searches are limited to 200 results (max). If you still can not find what you were looking for, please use better keywords" that is borderline useless imo. For staff or users with access to hidden forums this is an incomplete search. For everyone else this is am incomplete search too. The fact that it shows nothing more than 200 results is GG for users like me.[2017-3-27. : 3:45 pm] NudeRaider -- CorboCorbo shouted: ...so I have the search twice in order to get something mildly useful? no, you have to use the menu, if the 1-click quick search isn't enough.[2017-3-27. : 3:44 pm] NudeRaider -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Corbo seach something on the quick search, then click new seach alternatively: Site -> search[2017-3-27. : 3:44 pm] Corbo -- ...so I have the search twice in order to get something mildly useful?[2017-3-27. : 3:44 pm] NudeRaider -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: No, but I have some ideas. I've also been doing some optimizations and adding indexing behind the scenes. (surprisingly without breaking anything LMAO) da MVP doing God's work imo.  [2017-3-27. : 3:43 pm] NudeRaider -- CorboCorbo shouted: Where is this search LMAO that is definitely not what I see when I search seach something on the quick search, then click new seach[2017-3-27. : 3:43 pm] Corbo -- Where is this search LMAO that is definitely not what I see when I search |
Members Online: NudeRaider
NudeRaider