|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2014-9-28. : 11:28 pm]  Dem0n -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: bare equations are at bottom of first post: http://www.staredit.net/topic/16553/ Dem0n yea it's not meeting any end besides setting up dEUPs so it would have no consequence for you unless you understand them No it's like literally alien characters[2014-9-28. : 11:08 pm]  jjf28 -- lol i'm so bad with modding rules, tried changing a cannons attack to a psionic storm/probes particle beam but apparently that's asking for crashes[2014-9-28. : 11:03 pm]  Moose -- Though, actually, different players would need different units to come out of their individual buildings as they tech at different rates, so IDK if that would work, really[2014-9-28. : 11:02 pm] jjf28 -- hmm, I don't know exactly where "what unit comes out of a barracks" is stored[2014-9-28. : 11:01 pm] Moose -- How about those particular things, oh and getting rid of supply costs and/or maxes  [2014-9-28. : 10:59 pm] Moose -- Because I can make like, teh best civ map ever and people can use rally points and be like wow teching doesn't mess these up because things get replaced[2014-9-28. : 10:59 pm] Moose -- Can I use them to do all the fancy modding things I would want to like make the units built from a Barracks change in a civ map  [2014-9-28. : 10:38 pm] jjf28 -- well that's done till the questions start: http://www.staredit.net/355829/[2014-9-28. : 10:19 pm] jjf28 -- bare equations are at bottom of first post: http://www.staredit.net/topic/16553/ Dem0nDem0n shouted: I see it as gibberish. yea it's not meeting any end besides setting up dEUPs so it would have no consequence for you unless you understand them[2014-9-28. : 10:03 pm] jjf28 -- here's my new template map for dEUPs: http://puu.sh/bRPvJ/56a78d7d3e.scx , imma make some stuff with it to create hype before writing up the tutorial post for it but feel free to play around if you're comfortable with the bare equations[2014-9-28. : 6:26 pm] Zoan -- I edited it to include links for the screenshots, and now they just appear like they should  [2014-9-28. : 6:22 pm] poiuy_qwert -- If I quote you and preview the images show up. May just need to force a bbcode update. Try editing your post to get it to process the bbcode again?[2014-9-28. : 6:18 pm] Zoan -- http://www.staredit.net/topic/16533/ is anyone else not seeing the screenshots there? [2014-9-28. : 6:16 pm] jjf28 -- It would be like standing outside with the sun shining on your face. It would also set your hair on fire, so don't actually do it.[2014-9-28. : 5:26 pm] Moose -- This is because Gauss Jordan elimination can written as a series of matrix multiplications, that when done together, give you the inverse.[2014-9-28. : 5:21 pm] MasterJohnny -- which is faster getting inverse of A^k and multiplying b or getting A^k and doing gauss elimination[2014-9-28. : 5:19 pm] MasterJohnny -- man I have to write matlab psuedocode for this problem and I still have no idea what im doing[2014-9-28. : 5:09 pm] Moose -- Er, the original matrix might have eigenvalue(s) OF zero, which would make the diagonal matrix singular [2014-9-28. : 5:08 pm] Moose -- The diagonal might have zero eigenvalues, which would be a problem for invertibility[2014-9-28. : 5:01 pm] trgk -- http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/c/a/cca5bced8892fe27a2d4eb42d7d15f44.png[2014-9-28. : 5:00 pm] MasterJohnny -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: That has a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coppersmith%E2%80%93Winograd_algorithm which is faster. That article mentions something faster developed in 2010. The problem is this wikipedia page doesnt tell me what the coppersmith winograd algorithm actually is |
Members Online: IskatuMesk, Vrael
IskatuMesk, Vrael