|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2016-12-03. : 6:42 pm]  Moose -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Mini Moose 2707 should've read that. It's okay, you make us read the links you post for you, we wouldn't expect you to read our shouts either ROFL [2016-12-03. : 6:40 pm]  NudeRaider -- and yeah thats why I didn't include it in the first shout. Free admin access is just making things easier.[2016-12-03. : 6:39 pm] NudeRaider -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: The defeat of encryption is the real problem there. should've read that. [2016-12-03. : 6:39 pm] NudeRaider -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: From a security standpoint, physical access to the machine is good enough as root. not if your drive is encrypted.[2016-12-03. : 6:36 pm] Moose -- From a security standpoint, physical access to the machine is good enough as root.[2016-12-03. : 6:34 pm] NudeRaider -- I should add that during the upgrade process you can open a console with admin access.[2016-12-03. : 6:31 pm] Moose -- Ah, the overhead of encryption without the protection. Like leaving the key in the lock to your house but still locking and unlocking it every time. Laughing my ass off!!  [2016-12-03. : 6:29 pm] NudeRaider -- yay another excellent feature by Windows 10: Unlock encrypted drives during Windows updates. Makes any laptop thief happy and you wonder why you activated bitlocker in the first place.  [2016-12-03. : 6:28 pm] Moose -- Kim just used them. They wreck my Iron infantry specials, to be honest.[2016-12-03. : 5:38 pm] lil-Inferno -- your whole frontline just gets lit the fucc up while also getting bopped[2016-12-03. : 5:06 pm] Moose -- I don't think I've even seen Reavers used competitively in quite some time[2016-12-03. : 4:32 pm] Moose -- lil-Infernolil-Inferno shouted: Excalibur merrily merrily merrily merrily, archons and reavers NR 120 10/10 shout would read again[2016-12-03. : 4:09 pm] lil-Inferno -- ExcaliburExcalibur shouted: RoE RoE RoE your boat. merrily merrily merrily merrily, archons and reavers NR 120[2016-12-03. : 3:53 pm]  Corbo -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Corbo awwww I was hoping for an actual kayak. Meaning you go kayaking drunk I have done that too[2016-12-03. : 3:29 pm] jjf28 -- lil-Infernolil-Inferno shouted: NudeRaider damn that ssd thicc O_O https://youtu.be/bZdKVTyAgpY[2016-12-03. : 3:28 pm] lil-Inferno -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: jjf28 the wiki article talks about different thicknesses of the SSDs. But I really haven't gotten into the topic, so your guess is as good as mine. damn that ssd thicc O_O[2016-12-03. : 3:24 pm] NudeRaider -- btw. these are the conclusions I've drawn when researching 2,5" SSDs, but I don't see why stripping them of their case should change any of that.[2016-12-03. : 3:18 pm] NudeRaider -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: next question: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820156154&cm_re=M.2_SSD-_-20-156-154-_-Product vs http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=0D9-0006-000G4 , is SanDisk considered more reliable? they are both reputable brands so their products are usually solid (minus a couple bad ones which you can ALWAYS stumble into). You could start comparing performance as it varies a lot even between models of the same brand and also bigger is usually faster. But imo all of these considerations are not worth the effort. You won't notice a difference even when working with a slow drive unless you're actually measuring it. The same goes for durability, which is mainly governed by the technology. The differences in the same technology are also not worth investigating imo. So basically you either go samsung if you wanna have the best of the best or you choose whatever you can get at a discount.[2016-12-03. : 3:11 pm] NudeRaider -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: hey nude, are all M.2 2280's the same size as far as you know? the wiki article talks about different thicknesses of the SSDs. But I really haven't gotten into the topic, so your guess is as good as mine.[2016-12-03. : 2:43 pm] jjf28 -- does actually, used those search terms to find a topic where Ex is fond of crucial http://www.staredit.net/topic/16820/  [2016-12-03. : 2:41 pm] Dem0n -- If it helps, Roy said Crucial is almost always reliable except for one model, and that Sandisk is pretty good too, but that was for regular SSDs so w/e[2016-12-03. : 2:40 pm] jjf28 -- Dem0nDem0n shouted: ya srsly I don't think anyone here is going to know which laptop ssd is best LMAO probably not, but I'm new to this hardware and Nude and Ex tend to think of things I wouldn't[2016-12-03. : 2:35 pm] Dem0n -- ya srsly I don't think anyone here is going to know which laptop ssd is best LMAO[2016-12-03. : 2:21 pm] jjf28 -- noticed the SanDisk has 5 year > Crucials 3 year warrenty; not sure I even want to think that far ahead tho [2016-12-03. : 2:20 pm] Moose -- Judging by the review summary, 1 4-egg vs 19 5-egg, the Sandisk is better. But I don't actually know anything LMAO[2016-12-03. : 2:18 pm] Moose -- MasterJohnnyMasterJohnny shouted: Mini Moose 2707 I don't get this part: Since they're transcendental, they can't both be the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients. Saying "neither one can be the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients" might have been better phrasing.[2016-12-03. : 2:18 pm] IskatuMesk -- more LAM's more RAM you can download and bonus tacticool points[2016-12-03. : 2:05 pm] jjf28 -- next question: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820156154&cm_re=M.2_SSD-_-20-156-154-_-Product vs http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=0D9-0006-000G4 , is SanDisk considered more reliable?[2016-12-03. : 2:02 pm] jjf28 -- sort of solved, 22x80mm is my laptop and I can lookup SSD specs b4 I buy[2016-12-03. : 12:09 pm] NudeRaider -- IskatuMeskIskatuMesk shouted: ur face is bent sounds like an insult, but the facts check out, it's actually true![2016-12-03. : 11:58 am] jjf28 -- LanthanideLanthanide shouted: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg ... too real[2016-12-03. : 11:51 am] jjf28 -- (Data Usage Warning): https://www.facebook.com/uniladmag/videos/2475740912448953/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED[2016-12-03. : 11:44 am] jjf28 -- I think it'd be more intuitive if I knew the proof for "a transcendental number is not a root of a non-zero polynomial equation with integer (or, equivalently, rational) coefficients."; since that seems like it wouldn't willy-nilly be part of a definition[2016-12-03. : 11:37 am] jjf28 -- MasterJohnnyMasterJohnny shouted: Mini Moose 2707 I don't get this part: Since they're transcendental, they can't both be the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients. if (pi+e) and (pi*e) (the coeffecients of the expanded-form polymnomial) were both rational, then pi and e would be roots of a non-zero polynomial with all rational coefficients; pi and e are known transcendental numbers, so this cannot be the case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_number[2016-12-03. : 8:08 am] NudeRaider -- IskatuMeskIskatuMesk shouted: ♂ Spahgetti Is Only Straight Until It Gets Hot ♂ until it gets wet, actually.  but works all the same ofc  [2016-12-03. : 7:36 am] MasterJohnny -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: jjf28 Ya. Consider (x - pi) * (x - e) = 0. It has roots at e and pi. But it's also x^2 - (pi + e) * x + pi * e = 0. Since they're transcendental, they can't both be the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients. The coefficient of x^2 (1) is rational, so either or both the coefficient of x, pi + e, or the constant term pi * e, must be irrational. I don't get this part: Since they're transcendental, they can't both be the root of a polynomial with rational coefficients.[2016-12-03. : 7:05 am] NudeRaider -- Corbo awwww I was hoping for an actual kayak. Meaning you go kayaking drunk |
Members Online: BronwenGethin466, Butch
Butch