|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2016-12-05. : 5:43 am]  O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf, why haven't you linked to this already? I am ashamed.[2016-12-05. : 5:41 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: that's how I feel it should be; but absent of another definition Cecil is unavoidably technically correct Ah, the best kind of correct. [2016-12-05. : 5:39 am]  jjf28 -- that's how I feel it should be; but absent of another definition Cecil is unavoidably technically correct [2016-12-05. : 5:39 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- it's not turning it in to that code, it's just performing synonymous code[2016-12-05. : 5:38 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- interpreting is just that, reading a little bit and then immediately running predefined code that does the intended operation ;o[2016-12-05. : 5:37 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I've never considered interpreters as compilers, compiling to me means to actually turn it into a different form[2016-12-05. : 5:37 am] CecilSunkure -- I'd put the interpreting circle entirely into the compiling circle[2016-12-05. : 5:36 am] jjf28 -- in a venn diagram I'd put them in their own circles with some overlap[2016-12-05. : 5:34 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- emulators sometimes do that because it's faster to recompile to native machine code than to interpret it[2016-12-05. : 5:34 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- unless you re-compile the code to be interpreted, then run that[2016-12-05. : 5:33 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: I like how getting to the 3rd paragraph woulda preempted our entire argument xD "While all programs that take a set of programming specifications and translate them, i.e. create a means to execute those specifications, are technically "compilers", the term generally means a program that produces a separate executable from the compiler (that may require a run time library or subsystem to operate), a compiler that merely executes the original specifications is usually referred to as an "interpreter", although because of differing methods of analyzing what represents compilation and what represents interpretation, there is some overlap between the two terms." I figured a compiler turned a thing in to code to run on the CPU (or I guess you could compile to code to be interpreted), whereas an interpreter runs predefined machine code based on the interpreted code as input ;o[2016-12-05. : 5:16 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- (there are such things as duplicate instructions, and with prefixes you can fill your instructions with all sorts of garbage too)[2016-12-05. : 5:12 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- though it's stupid not to just use ASM because they're 1:1 (usually)[2016-12-05. : 5:12 am] O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Is machine code a programming language? C|X^D I've written in machine code before[2016-12-05. : 5:07 am] lil-Inferno -- LanthanideLanthanide shouted: we're not yet a vassel state of the uS cuz you don't have oil[2016-12-05. : 4:31 am] jjf28 -- I like how getting to the 3rd paragraph woulda preempted our entire argument xD "While all programs that take a set of programming specifications and translate them, i.e. create a means to execute those specifications, are technically "compilers", the term generally means a program that produces a separate executable from the compiler (that may require a run time library or subsystem to operate), a compiler that merely executes the original specifications is usually referred to as an "interpreter", although because of differing methods of analyzing what represents compilation and what represents interpretation, there is some overlap between the two terms."[2016-12-05. : 4:14 am] jjf28 -- not gonna care bout getting the 25FPS document processor up to 60FPS[2016-12-05. : 4:13 am] CecilSunkure -- game not much different from operating systems, or from microsoft word, or your Uber app[2016-12-05. : 4:12 am] jjf28 -- though with game programming I suppose I can see wanting those little optimizations everywhere[2016-12-05. : 4:12 am] jjf28 -- conventional wisdom has far less time-spent developing and debugging [2016-12-05. : 4:08 am] CecilSunkure -- Another link you might like jjf: http://www.codercorner.com/blog/?p=1202[2016-12-05. : 4:03 am] CecilSunkure -- Premature optimization is the root of all evil, is the root of all evil C|X^DDD[2016-12-05. : 4:01 am] jjf28 -- mm, there are tons of limits to compilers; still gotta avoid that premature optimization[2016-12-05. : 3:58 am] CecilSunkure -- jjf you might find this interesting: http://www.codersnotes.com/notes/beating-the-compiler/[2016-12-05. : 3:56 am] CecilSunkure -- gotta optimize shitty php consumption, only serve the shoutbox to users. Forums written in OOP[2016-12-05. : 3:53 am] Moose -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: its ok just blame it on OOP He had an OOPsie LMAO [2016-12-05. : 3:53 am] Moose -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: CecilSunkure was bound to happen to me one of these times  [2016-12-05. : 3:52 am] jjf28 -- CecilSunkureCecilSunkure shouted: Ok, wikipedia definition means you were wrong then. was bound to happen to me one of these times [2016-12-05. : 3:52 am] Moose -- I mean, I can look at the binaries on my system and see the bits and bytes that make up the file.[2016-12-05. : 3:51 am] jjf28 -- Machine Code: "a computer programming language consisting of binary or hexadecimal instructions that a computer can respond to directly."[2016-12-05. : 3:51 am] CecilSunkure -- Yeah I think it is, since people wrote shit with machine language back in the day[2016-12-05. : 3:49 am] jjf28 -- kind-of... you can write programs in it... but then again I can write programs in SC unit properties so w/e |
jjf
Members Online: Roy, O)FaRTy1billion[MM]
Roy, O)FaRTy1billion[MM]