Profile for laskarcuan
| Basic | Contributions | Activity-Logs | Administration |
|
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)