Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: Why do player colors vary by machine?
Why do player colors vary by machine?
Jan 30 2010, 10:16 pm
By: Elward  

Jan 30 2010, 10:16 pm Elward Post #1



I used SCMDraft2 0.8 on my 32-bit Windows XP machine and 64-bit Vista machine. The same map used a Jungle tileset. I used color 47 in each case.

XP: Black smooth on units. Shows as black on minimap and leaderboard.
Vista: What's this garbled lemon-lime color!? Shows as black on minimap and blank on leaderboard.

Is there a stable black color (units and minimap) on a Jungle tileset for all operating systems? If so, what?



None.

Jan 30 2010, 10:24 pm Apos Post #2

I order you to forgive yourself!

For black, I usually use 155. I don't have vista so can't test if it's the same.




Jan 30 2010, 10:25 pm samsizzle Post #3



64 shows up as actual black on the leaderboard on most tilesets. Its what i use. That or 55.



None.

Jan 30 2010, 11:40 pm ImagoDeo Post #4



Despite the awesomeness of extended colors, you have to remember that they're actually a buffer overflow. It's unlikely that they'll crash mac users, but it'll look a lot different for them.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 31 2010, 2:52 am by NudeRaider. Reason: fix'd



None.

Jan 31 2010, 2:00 am Lanthanide Post #5



I'm using 136 for P8 on Ashworld on windows 7 x64, and it shows black in-game and on the minimap, although blank on the leaderboard (not a problem for me, as it is a CPU player anyway).

I got that number out of a thread where someone wanted a black colour, so it is likely to be fairly stable across other tilesets and OS combinations? I can't get the P colour program to work on my computer (haven't tried particularly hard).



None.

Feb 1 2010, 8:23 pm DavidJCobb Post #6



@Lan: I'm using PColor 1.1 on MSWinXPProSP2, and I get a palette that's almost black, save for two colors. One is a light grey, the other a pulsing/glowing slightly-dark red. Speckles appear on most units because of this. 149 is a 90%-perfect black, save for a shade of brown in the palette. Same deal for 160, but red, and the red's in a color that isn't used as often.

That too unstable?



None.

Feb 4 2010, 12:40 am Suicidal Insanity Post #7

I see you !

Since it is a buffer overflow it just uses memory meant for other data. That is why it depends on the OS, OS version, machine architecture, and maybe even which applications were in memory before starcraft was started,




Feb 4 2010, 12:54 am Lanthanide Post #8



Right, I guess it's back to brown for my P8 CPU then. I don't want to use any buffer overflow or memory conditions in my map at all, so that it'll work on any new versions of SC, and on every platform without issues.



None.

Feb 4 2010, 5:16 pm NudeRaider Post #9

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Extended colors don't cause issues other than looking different on different machines. And usually not by much.

Btw. what Samsizzle suggested is really great. I use #64 for all my maps. It's actually a very dark purple (looks black if you have no true black to compare it with) and it's pure in color. So there will be no weird specks or anything. And I've yet to see a tileset/OS not show it as black.




Feb 4 2010, 6:36 pm ImagoDeo Post #10



Quote from NudeRaider
Extended colors don't cause issues other than looking different on different machines. And usually not by much.

Btw. what Samsizzle suggested is really great. I use #64 for all my maps. It's actually a very dark purple (looks black if you have no true black to compare it with) and it's pure in color. So there will be no weird specks or anything. And I've yet to see a tileset/OS not show it as black.

#65 crashed Ciara's mac when she tried to look at it.

Apparently some colors do cause crashes...



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[11:30 pm]
Ultraviolet -- That's strange, it looks like you targeted the base image file (sometimes people make the mistake of just using the imgur page link which doesn't work for embedding) but it still didn't work it sounds like.
[03:34 pm]
ManCubuS -- Used : " [img=https://i.imgur.com/gpOjTuD.jpeg] "
[03:28 pm]
ManCubuS -- Even tried with imgur, doesn't attach.
[03:14 pm]
ManCubuS -- I should try a workaround, thanks! Sadly imgur is blocked in my country for some unknown reason.
[03:05 pm]
NudeRaider -- I think SEN has trouble with https or hotlinking is forbidden. It certainly is nothing about the size, it just fails to get any size. You can get it working if you use imgur and include the actual image link for the img tag. Like this: [img=https://i.imgur.com/ddYqXZa.jpeg]
[11:15 am]
ManCubuS -- Hey fellas! Anyone knows why when I try to upload an image it says "failed to get image size"? I even tried making it so small. Imgur isn't working here and I tried postimg no luck.
[2026-7-23. : 6:40 am]
Oh_Man -- true
[2026-7-23. : 3:16 am]
RIVE -- Still annoyed there was never a trigger to stop or pause wavs.
[2026-7-23. : 1:40 am]
Oh_Man -- tthen u come to SCBW and it's like - upload WAV, play WAV.... sigh why cant it be that easy
[2026-7-23. : 1:40 am]
Oh_Man -- and no consistent easy to use way to then play the audio either
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Symmetry