Staredit Network > Forums > General StarCraft > Topic: TS tourny date
TS tourny date
Oct 3 2009, 4:31 pm
By: ClansAreForGays  
Polls
What night(s) WON'T work for you?
What night(s) WON'T work for you?
Answer Votes Percentage % Voters
Sunday 3
 
30%
Monday 1
 
10%
Tuesday 0
 
0%
None.
Wednesday 1
 
10%
Thursday 0
 
0%
None.
Friday 2
 
20%
Saturday 3
 
30%
Please login to vote.
Poll has 10 votes. You can vote for at most 3 option(s).

Oct 3 2009, 4:31 pm ClansAreForGays Post #1



Remember it's what nights you CAN'T make it.




Oct 3 2009, 6:58 pm Riney Post #2

Thigh high affectionado

I would have picked all of them, but since only 3 answers are allowed I couldnt.



.riney on Discord.
Riney on Steam (Steam)
@RineyCat on Twitter

Sure I didn't pop off on SCBW like I wanted to, but I won VRChat. Map maker for life.

Oct 3 2009, 8:17 pm ClansAreForGays Post #3



I'm putting on the 20th now so mod close this.




Oct 3 2009, 8:50 pm Decency Post #4



Do you have a stable map or expect one by then?

The majority of people don't want to play 1.5, MT, M3, or M7. Each has a few supporters but we need a working M8 to make the tournament work as well as it has the potential to.



None.

Oct 3 2009, 11:08 pm Jack Post #5

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

Probably it will be m3.2



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Oct 3 2009, 11:15 pm Norm Post #6



Should use MT, it's still not balance, but it's better than any others that i've played



None.

Oct 3 2009, 11:19 pm Jack Post #7

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

Have you played m3.1 though?



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Oct 4 2009, 12:11 am xYoshix Post #8



I've played M3.1. It would have been perfect if it weren't for the glitches and exploits. I would love for a fixed one tp be used for this tourney.
I'll just point out some bugs: Marine's l4 on the beacon gives mass mana, assault's vultures from l3 stay there and don't stun. That's all I've seen so far.



None.

Oct 4 2009, 12:38 am Jack Post #9

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

He fixed the lvl 3. The mines-on-beacon is because for every mine on the beacon over 1, you get 5 gas back and the mine is destroyed. It would be better if mining a beacon didn't give gas back at all, so capping costs 25 mana. Reasonable IMO.



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Oct 4 2009, 1:08 am ClansAreForGays Post #10



Zany is correct that It will be 3.2

3.1 had some glitches with firebat, but I have fixed all of them so M3.2 can be what is what mean to be - MT/M3 on steroids. 3.2's (which should now be circulating) briefing now starts off with informing you of the 10/20 tourny date as well. Everything you need to know about 3.2 and its changes will be included in the forthcoming tournament topic.

Done - http://www.staredit.net/topic/8711/

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 4 2009, 3:06 am by ClansAreForGays. Reason: added link




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:31 am]
NudeRaider -- blessed innocent soul knows nothing of the strife we had before EUDs were discovered :teehee:
[2026-6-23. : 3:29 am]
DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.
[2026-6-22. : 8:35 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2026-6-21. : 11:38 pm]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically
[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?
[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings
[2026-6-20. : 6:15 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.
[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.
[2026-6-20. : 3:43 pm]
NudeRaider -- Contained nothing new for me. Didn't know all building's behavior, but very much all unit's. Also Terran balance whine - also nothing new :lol:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Excalibur