Quote from 
Falkoner
FalkonerYou'd have to find the address of one of his pointers, which is highly unlikely..
So what about my idea with SCMLoader? Would it work?
None.
Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: EUD Question: Finding a programs memory?
EUD Question: Finding a programs memory?
So what about my idea with SCMLoader? Would it work?
Well, it's not like the hack loads things in the map, so I don't think it'd work as you think, but maybe I misunderstood you, but I think a similar concept would be to use crashing extended units(by entering unit IDs), which I'm not certain he has blocked all of, so that might be a path that can more easily be taken once SI updates SCM Draft to allow manual Unit ID changing.
None.
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
http://www.staredit.net/146645/
I'll have you know that I was saying this from the beginning. I don't see why you can't just ban someone when they type in /mh.
I'll have you know that I was saying this from the beginning. I don't see why you can't just ban someone when they type in /mh.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
Because most people will use Instert which toggles the mh, its much quicker 
None.
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
Ban on insert
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
But what if I type in /mh asa joke or hit insert on accident? The latter could be a common error, and isn't too unlikely to make your solution have too many false-fires to be useful, not to mention if a hack is already loaded with the map hack on it doesn't detect it.
None.
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
I never press insert while playing sc. I never type /mh. Anyone who does deserves to be banned. Seriously, the only thing close to insert is print screen.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
Well, I would prefer it to never be a variable that they are not hacking. And actually, in the game I'm making the triggers for ( Snipers ) you need to take Screenshots of certain things at times. So, unless they are hacking I don't want them ever to drop.
None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Members Online: 
Moose
Moose