None.
Which detects a unit faster:
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 6 2009, 12:28 am
By:
ForTheSwarm
Mar 6 2009, 12:28 am
By:
ForTheSwarm
Pages: 1
I have a stargate spell system, and I want to know which condition detects units faster: bring or commands.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
bring.
It updates in the same trigger loop when you do either of these actions:
It updates in the same trigger loop when you do either of these actions:
Quote
Kill Unit
Kill Unit at Location
Remove Unit
Remove Unit At Location
Move Location
Move Unit
Kill Unit at Location
Remove Unit
Remove Unit At Location
Move Location
Move Unit
Normally, it's bring, like Nude said, if you do any of those actions he said, both bring and command update, so if you want to detect new units in the same trigger loop as they are created, you have to run one of those actions, even if it does nothing.
None.
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
So the wiki is wrong? It says bring and command detect units killed in that trigger cycle.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
If they're killed by using triggers, it will, but manually, no, not unless one of those actions run.
Also, you have to remember that there isn't an updating problem unless you're using HyperTriggers, if you aren't using them it updates just fine.
Also, you have to remember that there isn't an updating problem unless you're using HyperTriggers, if you aren't using them it updates just fine.
None.
All right, I'll use bring. Thanks!
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier