Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Idea: Recreating Polling Forum
Idea: Recreating Polling Forum
Dec 14 2008, 4:42 pm
By: WoAHorde  

Dec 14 2008, 4:42 pm WoAHorde Post #1



Back on SEN V4.1, we had a Polling Forum that was a subforum in null. It caused a lot less spam and allowed for forums games such as Survivor to be played without cluttering up the place. I think it would behoove us to reopen the polling booth.

Thoughts? Endorsements?



None.

Dec 14 2008, 5:15 pm WoAHorde Post #2



It's not for forum games, it's for all the polls created in Null. On old SEN, we had 11 pages of only polls involving things from Survivor to What's Your Favourite Colour.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 5:18 pm Dapperdan Post #3



I'm in favor of the idea, but I don't really care that much.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 5:19 pm Vi3t-X Post #4



So... why exactly was I reported?

If you're going to create a polling subforum, you'd need guidelines. Would the forum be nothing BUT polls? Or would there be text involved?



None.

Dec 14 2008, 5:21 pm WoAHorde Post #5



Every topic was a poll, but you could post in the topics. It allowed us to play poll-based forum games like Survivor without cluttering up the place, and ask random questions such as "How old are you!?111one"



None.

Dec 14 2008, 6:47 pm DT_Battlekruser Post #6



I agree; people are going to try to make these topics anyway, so it would be a good idea to keep a forum for them.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 7:57 pm Forsaken Archer Post #7



Games forum > poll forum?
Polls forum would lead to lots of stupid polls due to it's sole nature.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 8:16 pm Dapperdan Post #8



Quote from name:isolatedpurity
Games forum > poll forum?
Polls forum would lead to lots of stupid polls due to it's sole nature.

I don't see the point in putting a poll forum as a subcategory to the Games forum... it fits better underneath Null. If there are a lot of stupid polls, and you don't want that, then we can make up some rules against stupid polls so that we have a grounds to close them.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 8:24 pm Forsaken Archer Post #9



I meant, instead of a poll forum, a forum games forum.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 8:34 pm Dapperdan Post #10



Quote from name:isolatedpurity
I meant, instead of a poll forum, a forum games forum.

Oooooooooooo. If you do that there's going to be a whole lot of people starting stupid forum games just the same. I think I'd rather have a poll forum myself.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 8:48 pm Corbo Post #11

ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO

Quote from Dapperdan
Quote from name:isolatedpurity
I meant, instead of a poll forum, a forum games forum.

Oooooooooooo. If you do that there's going to be a whole lot of people starting stupid forum games just the same. I think I'd rather have a poll forum myself.
I agree.
A resurrected polling booth under null will be the way to go.
I remember that some part of the polls made were also not games. I know I did use it sometimes for statistical recordings :P



fuck you all

Dec 14 2008, 9:00 pm DT_Battlekruser Post #12



Third-ed. The statistics in the polling booth were often amusing.



None.

Dec 14 2008, 10:43 pm Biophysicist Post #13



Fourthed.



None.

Jul 30 2009, 4:42 am Hug A Zergling Post #14



Both!



None.

Jul 30 2009, 6:12 am Demented Shaman Post #15



Well since there's a debate about whether there should be a games or polling booth subforum of Null then I say we we just title the subforum "Other". That way you'll be able to post either a forum game or a poll, much like you can now in Null.



None.

Jul 30 2009, 7:02 am InsolubleFluff Post #16



Why do you oppose a games forum? You don't have to visit it, and it would clean null up. Remember the objective of the site is a fun community for Mappers/ Modders/ StarCraft players. You aren't demeaning the site by allowing forum games and an average level of English...



None.

Jul 30 2009, 1:08 pm MadZombie Post #17



You could have it as a temporary forum so we don't assume thats it's gonna go horribly wrong and instead get "proof" that it will. After 3-4 stupid topics that start off the second the admins open the forum they can just as simply close it, delete it, and forget about the idea. No one gets injured. Ez Pz.



None.

Jul 30 2009, 1:30 pm Phobos Post #18

Are you sure about that?

Quote from name:Shocko
Why do you oppose a games forum? You don't have to visit it, and it would clean null up. Remember the objective of the site is a fun community for Mappers/ Modders/ StarCraft players. You aren't demeaning the site by allowing forum games and an average level of English...
Silly games get started all the time, endorses spam, attracts the kind of people SeN does not want.



this is signature

Jul 30 2009, 5:13 pm Demented Shaman Post #19



Quote from name:Pariah
Well since there's a debate about whether there should be a games or polling booth subforum of Null then I say we we just title the subforum "Other". That way you'll be able to post either a forum game or a poll, much like you can now in Null.
Taking this one step further, we should rename Null to The Inferno. Then we'd have nine levels of "hell" each one representing a certain kind of null topic and level of stupidity. As you get deeper into the Inferno, the topics will get dumber and crappier. In the ninth circle you will find the scum of SEN posting.

For example, the first circle would be called Limbo and it would have a subforum that would be the second circle. The second circle would have a subforum to the third and the third a subforum to the fourth until you get to the ninth circle.



None.

Jul 30 2009, 5:18 pm poison_us Post #20

Master has given Dobby a doctorate! Dobby is free!

Quote from name:Pariah
For example, the first circle would be called Limbo and it would have a subforum that would be the second circle. The second circle would have a subforum to the third and the third a subforum to the fourth until you get to the ninth circle.

This, except as subforums of null, not of each other.




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[04:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically
[04:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?
[04:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings
[06:15 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.
[03:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.
[03:43 pm]
NudeRaider -- Contained nothing new for me. Didn't know all building's behavior, but very much all unit's. Also Terran balance whine - also nothing new :lol:
[2026-6-19. : 9:57 am]
Oh_Man -- makes me wonder if SEN knows anything about the topic
[2026-6-19. : 9:57 am]
Oh_Man -- artosis dropped pretty interesting vid: https://youtu.be/EqZHB8Blra4
[2026-6-18. : 5:01 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2026-6-17. : 6:15 am]
RexyRex -- :wob:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: jun3hong