Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: Friggin ROADSIGN!!!
Friggin ROADSIGN!!!
Apr 26 2008, 8:43 am
By: gaiaguerrilla  

Apr 26 2008, 8:43 am gaiaguerrilla Post #1



Can anyone just tell me what this means?

"The instruction at 0x004d7a25 referenced memory at 0x0000004f. The memory could not be written"

This is from the latest SCMdraft2. Every time I make a damn map I get these roadsigns, and my map doesn't play.

If I atleast can understand what the coordinates are, I can locate the problem and try to fix it. It always gives me different coordinates on different maps. Where are these ones? How do I know what it means?

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Apr 26 2008, 10:06 am by gaiaguerrilla.



None.

Apr 26 2008, 12:22 pm The_z0r Post #2



Hmm...

I seem to recall having problems like this when the backup database got too big. Try delete the backup database in your SCMDraft2 folder (should be backupDB.scmdDB).

I think that error means there was a write error in the program. I'm not entirely sure.



None.

Apr 26 2008, 4:19 pm DT_Battlekruser Post #3



SEGFAULT!

Unfortunately, the details of a segfault don't tell you very much unless you have the source code in front of you, and even then not much in that form. I would recommend either re-installing SCMDraft or trying to contact its creator.




None.

Apr 27 2008, 12:10 am gaiaguerrilla Post #4



Thanks. I had also brought this to the stormcoast forum of the makers. I did previously make a backup file. I think I'll try reinstall.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM]