Should there be an active member list at the bottom of the page? (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Should there be an active member list at the bottom of the page?

Should there be an active member list at the bottom of the page?

This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 24 2008, 1:00 am
By:

Dapperdan

Pages: < 1 2

Polls

Should there be an active member list at the bottom of the page?

Answer	Votes	Percentage	%	Voters
Yes	34		88%	None.
No	5		13%	None.

Please login to vote.
Poll has 39 votes. You can vote for at most 2 option(s).

Mar 25 2008, 3:36 am

DT_Battlekruser Post #21

Yes, and a "members online today" too, please.

None.

Mar 25 2008, 3:37 am

DT_Battlekruser Post #22

test?

EDIT ~ I made the 20th post in this topic and it updated me as the last poster but did not paginate the second page..

None.

Mar 25 2008, 3:57 am

Doodan Post #23

Yes PLZ. It makes it easier to stalk.

None.

Mar 25 2008, 7:34 am

Forsaken Archer Post #24

okay, i suppose

None.

Mar 25 2008, 9:22 pm

Dapperdan Post #25

Thanks IP.

None.

Mar 25 2008, 9:25 pm

JamaL Post #26

[insert extreme gratitude and emoticons relating to the feeling now held by all]

None.

Mar 25 2008, 9:26 pm

Moose Post #27

Armor: 90.50%

Quote from Dapperdan

Thanks IP.

I coded it. F U.

you didn't live, you doomscrolled

Options

Pages: < 1 2

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[03:02 am]

Vrael -- which does reduce down to the same tradeoff I mentioned below, aka trading APM for time, but still interesting

[03:01 am]

Vrael -- and while the reaver was reloading it used that time to aggregate enough marine/tank to fend it off

[03:01 am]

Vrael -- like its micro vs one of the in-base reaver drops was pretty insane, basically it made the reaver spend 1 scarab per unit instead of 1 scarab for many workers/units

[02:58 am]

Vrael -- all the stuff I've said below is based on the actual gameplay vs some strong human performers, seems like the bot just has unfair advantages, but its also doing some cool stuff

[02:57 am]

Vrael -- NimoStar

NimoStar shouted: If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface

I mean human brains trained the bot too, its not completely infeasible for the bot to actually be strong in certain scenarios

[10:13 pm]

Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations

[10:12 pm]

Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago

[05:47 pm]

NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface

[05:34 pm]

NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.

[02:13 pm]

Oh_Man -- all g

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

Vrael