Staredit Network > Forums > General StarCraft > Topic: Game networking
Game networking
Aug 12 2015, 1:02 am
By: iCCup.xboi209  

Aug 12 2015, 1:02 am iCCup.xboi209 Post #1



What version of Winsock and which functions does SC use to send and receive ingame packets?



None.

Aug 13 2015, 8:21 pm Neiv Post #2



SC uses UDP, so it would be reasonable to expect that at winsock level it uses sendto/recvfrom.
For what version it uses, I think it calls WSAStartup(0x101) if that is what you mean.. You could just verify it by looking at it in debugger though. It also uses mostly the Berkeley sockets functions.

And most of (all?) the winsock functions are hidden behind the storm SNet api, which may be documented somewhere.

Some info about the storm packet format is here: https://bnetdocs.org/?op=doc&did=34
Also at end of this page: https://code.google.com/p/vgce/wiki/starcraftCommands#Packet_Header



None.

Aug 14 2015, 9:35 am iCCup.xboi209 Post #3



What about the functions like WSASendTo/WSARecvFrom? Does SC use a combination of wsock32.dll and ws2_32.dll?



None.

Aug 14 2015, 1:11 pm Neiv Post #4



These are the only winsock functions use by standard.snp
Code
wsock32:
#2 bind
#3 closesocket
#9 htons
#17 recvfrom
#20 sendto
#21 setsockopt
#23 socket
#111 WSAGetLastError
#115 WSAStartup
#116 WSACleanup

wsa2_32:
WSAIoctl


At least on my pc though, wsock32 functions just redirect to ws32_32.
Battle.snp uses other functions as well, as it needs to communicate with the chat server, and it is not required to share any of its code with standard.snp, but ingame communication should be the same.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[03:29 am]
DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.
[2026-6-22. : 8:35 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2026-6-21. : 11:38 pm]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically
[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?
[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings
[2026-6-20. : 6:15 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.
[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.
[2026-6-20. : 3:43 pm]
NudeRaider -- Contained nothing new for me. Didn't know all building's behavior, but very much all unit's. Also Terran balance whine - also nothing new :lol:
[2026-6-19. : 9:57 am]
Oh_Man -- makes me wonder if SEN knows anything about the topic
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: NudeRaider